|
|
Jury
Duty
for release
on 08-19-04
On Monday, August 16th, Oprah Winfrey showed her good citizenship by reporting
for jury duty. She was confident that her high profile would disqualify
her from service but was surprised to be selected to sit on the jury in
the murder trial of Dion Coleman, 27, accused of shooting Walter Holley,
23, in a dispute over $50 in February 2002.
Mr. Coleman might correctly wonder if this is a "jury of his peers."
What is a jury of your peers?
If you are a crack dealer, should you be tried by a jury of stock brokers
and school teachers and computer programmers? Or should you be tried by
a jury of other crack dealers?
I have faced three juries in my lifetime and never once did I feel like
they were my peers. I was convicted by a jury one time where the members
actually believed that narcs were capable of telling the truth. These
weren't my peers. They didn't live in the same world as I did.
Maybe Oprah would be better suited for Michael Jackson's jury, or Kobe
Bryant's.
If you were on trial for murder, who would you consider a jury of your
peers?
I would want Norman Mailer and William F. Buckley and Hunter S. Thompson
and Tom Wolfe and Molly Ivins and Oscar Wilde and William Burroughs and
Walter Cronkite and Courtney Love and Lenny Bruce and George Carlin and
Bill Clinton on mine.
The last time I was tried by a jury of my 'peers' it was in the literarily
correct year of 1984. It was the perfect year for Big Brother to stomp
on me with his black shiny FBI shoes. After my conviction, the first thing
I saw when I reached the Wynne Unit of the Texas Dept. of Corrections
was the TV coverage of the John DeLorean trial. It was called the Texas
Dept. of Corrections then. As a result of an inmate lawsuit, which objected
that there was no such thing as 'corrections' going on in that warehouse
for bodies, they changed the name to Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice--another
misnomer.
I had just been handed a 35 year sentence in a drug case that was a far
more egregious example of entrapment than DeLorean's. He got off and I
watched it from behind bars. The only difference in his trial and mine
was that he had four million dollars to spend on a defense team and I
had a drunken lawyer in College Station Texas who was too embarrassed
to stick around for my sentencing. I suspect he was working for the prosecution
anyway.
It's amazing what a difference there is between a high profile celebrity
criminal trial and the ones that most of us get. When my jury was empaneled,
Oprah was nowhere to be seen. The only observers at my trial were my grandfather
(who they barred from the courtroom for most of the proceedings because
he was a potential witness) and a solitary, dozing local reporter. That
is until the last day of the trial, when the DA imported a Junior High
school civics class. He squired them in and sat them down facing the jury
to underscore his point that the victims of my 'crimes' were these fresh
faced young darlings. He marched up and down in front of the jury dramatically
and noisily cocking a rifle that was seized in the bust, which I had never
laid a finger on, and said something to the effect of, "No telling
how many schoolchildren this heinous criminal has Crucified On The Cross
of Drugs." It was quite a show. Very William Jennings Bryan. But,
like I said, nobody was there to see it. If it had been televised, there
would have been commentary on what a railroad job was being delivered
by this kangaroo court.
Criminal trials are, in a sense, the pinnacle of our system of government.
"Innocent until proven guilty" and "liberty and JUSTICE
for all" are the cornerstones of our civil culture. The concept is
that every citizen, in a trial, gets a full and a fair hearing of the
facts. In the high profile cases this is fairly well the case. When we
see a Martha Stewart or a Kobe Bryant or an O.J. Simpson or a John DeLorean
on trial, all the processes are scrupulously followed so that the public
can be convinced that justice is being done. But in the usual cases, the
ones where you and I are on trial, the processes are embarrassingly perfunctory.
The gavel comes down in a routine manner. It's paperwork.
This is not to say that prison isn't hard, even for celebrities. When
I was locked up in what certain ignoramuses call a country club prison,
they had basketball and sports on TV and handball courts and weightlifting.
My first question was, "Where is the golf course?" I was locked
up not fifteen feet from David Crosby and while I can't say that he didn't
get a certain amount of special treatment because of his celebrity, we
ate in the same chow hall and bathed in the same shower. But for comparable
'crimes,' he did nine months and I was sentenced to 35 years.
The Poet's Eye sees that we have two justice systems in this country,
much as John Edwards describes our economic system. We have one justice
system for the rich and famous and quite another for you and I. Try to
imagine the difference in the legal proceedings if you got arrested for
shoplifting and if Wynonna Ryder gets arrested for shoplifting. She has
months of pre-trial hearings and photo-ops followed by probation and community
service (more photo-ops) and you get dispatched summarily to the County
Jail. Bang. Next case.
Justice
That Justice is a blind goddess
Is a thing to which we black are wise.
Her bandage hides two festering sores
That once perhaps were eyes.
--Langston Hughes
|
|
|
|