The
Poet's Eye
HOME
Lightning
Rod
World Headquarters
Studio
Eight.tv
Showcase for
Writers, Artists,
Musicians & More
Studio Eight Forums
Discuss the Arts
& Comment on
The Poet's Eye
Freedom
Hall
say anything
doreenperi.com
Art, poetry, music
|
|
|
|
"It's
ok to bite his ear off as long as I get my friends to do it, right?"
|
|
|
|
Queensbury
Rules
For release
on 08-23-04
This presidential
election is shaping up to be the hottest fight since The Rumble in the
Jungle in 1974, the classic bout between Ali and Foreman that was promoted
by Don King in Zaire. But the World Wrestling Federation might be a better
overseer of it than the Federal Election Commission.
The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as "McCain-Feingold"
left a loophole in the campaign finance rules that is big enough to drive
a tour bus through, or at the very least a Swift boat.
Sen. Kerry has filed a complaint with the FEC protesting the collusion
between the Bush campaign and the group called Swift Boat Veterans for
Truth. At the same time the Bush campaign moans about getting slammed
by 527 groups like MoveOn.org and ACT. All of this is fake outrage of
course, like the grunting and grimacing in pro wrestling.
"527 groups" are called such because section 527 of the Internal
Revenue Code governs organizations that primarily attempt to influence
election campaigns, organizations like MoveOn and ACT and the Swifties.
The money spent by these groups doesn't count against the campaign spending
caps imposed on the candidates themselves and also they can act as the
pit-bulls of the respective campaigns and deliver the down and dirty messages
that the candidates themselves can disavow if they go too far beyond the
bounds of decorum.
Everyone knows that you can't run a modern presidential campaign on the
measly little 72 million bucks that the taxpayers provide for the major
candidates, so the need arose for shadow or parallel organizations to
take up the slack. These organizations spend millions in soft money to
do the same thing that the major party organizations do--they buy advertising
designed to get their candidate elected or, as is more commonly the case,
to get the other candidate defeated.
In the past week, the comparison has often been drawn between the Swift
Boat Gang, who are working for Bush, and the MoveOn gang that are working
for Kerry. There are two things wrong with this comparison. One is that
the MoveOn gang is a grassroots organization supported by a wide popular
base estimated at over two million, while the Swift gang is funded by
a couple of George Bush's rich buddies in Texas. The other is that MoveOn
was founded in 1998 and the Swift Boaters were only instituted since the
presidential campaign began.
Debra Deshong of the Kerry campaign says that, "MoveOn.org is an
independent organization that existed well before the Kerry campaign,"
whereas Swift Boat Veterans for Truth "is not an independent group."
Which gets us to the question of collusion between the main parties and
their shadow surrogates. This is what the Campaign Reform Act forbids.
You can raise or spend all the money you want to advertise your message
if you are a private group. What you can't do is coordinate your activities
with the party campaign organizations. It's long been a police tactic
to let an informant do the dirty work and then claim that you don't know
him when you get to court. It always reminds me of tag-team professional
wrestling. You know, the scenario where one team-member distracts the
referee while the other whacks the opponent on the head with the bell
ringer. It's a broad metaphor for what our election system has become,
a circus in a cesspool.
The
front page article in the NY Times of 08-20-04 by KATE ZERNIKE and
JIM RUTENBERG0
goes into chapter and verse about the connections between the Swift Boaters
and Bushco.
Harlan Crow and Bob J. Perry, through longtime social and business contacts,
are associated with the Bush family. (Dare I call it the Royal Family?)
Crow and Perry are the primary supporters of the Swift Boat gang. Mr.
Perry has given them $200,000 with which they have bought television ads
and published a half a million books full of questionable facts. Mr. Crow,
the seventh-largest donor to Republicans in the state according to the
Texans for Public Justice, is a Dallas real estate magnate who is the
second largest donor to the Swift gang.
It could also be said that George Soros's support of the anti-Bush campaign
through contributions to organizations like ACT amounts to the same thing
as Perry and Crow's support of the anti-Kerry efforts. Politics comes
down to who has the most money and the best friends, or the most friends
and the best money. Or it could be who has the worst friends with the
most money.
For my money, the answer to this whole mess is Don
King.
The Poet's Eye has a vision for the future of our elections. We need to
forget all these campaign finance regulations and the FEC and special
tax loopholes and just make an Election Czar to run our presidential races.
I suggest we get somebody with some practical experience in these areas.
Someone like Don King. Yes, King would be perfect. We could call him Czar
King. He's promoted some of the biggest fights in modern boxing history.
He is a ruthless promoter who focuses on the showmanship of
the fight and never signs an agreement that wont make money for
him and everyone else involved. He could sign a contract with both candidates
which would insure his impartiality because he knows he's going to get
rich no matter who wins.
The
Queensbury Rules
by Marquis of Queensbury
1.
To be a fair stand-up boxing match in a twenty-four foot ring
or as near that size as practicable.
2. No wrestling or hugging allowed.
3. The rounds to be of three minutes
duration and one minute time between rounds.
4. If either man fall through weakness
or otherwise, he must get up unassisted, ten seconds be allowed
to do so, the other man meanwhile to return to his corner; and
when the fallen man is on his legs the round is to be resumed
and continued until the three minutes have expired. If one man
fails to come to the scratch in the ten seconds allowed, it shall
be in the power of the referee to give his awart in favour of
the other man.
5. A man hanging on the ropes in
a helpless state, with his toes off the ground, shall be considered
down.
6.
No seconds or any other person to be allowed in the ring during
the rounds.
7. Should the contest be stopped
by any unavoidable interference, the referee (is) to name the
time and place as soon as possible for finishing the contest,
to that the match can be won and lost, unless the backers of the
men agree to draw the stakes.
8. The gloves to be fair-sized boxing
gloves of the best quality and new.
9. Should a glove burst, or come
off, it must be replaced to the referee's satisfaction.
10. A man on one knee is considered
down, and if struck is entitled to the stakes.
11. No shoes or boots with springs
allowed.
12. The contest in all other respects
to be governed by the revised rules of the London Prize Rin
|
|