Search found 619 matches
- August 21st, 2004, 10:03 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: gay marriage
- Replies: 25
- Views: 11015
Bennies .... ooohhhh!
I guess I'm a little slow on the uptake, here :D I thought you meant LRod's "bennies" not "benefit" bennies. Even if unintended, it was a nice play on words! I know that if I had kids right now, I'd be poppin' some of those bennies LRod is making with his alleged chemistry set. As for your being sel...
- August 21st, 2004, 9:03 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: gay marriage
- Replies: 25
- Views: 11015
I must've been incredibly unclear in my original posts about this topic, because you, Mnaz (of all people), thought I was advocating Social Services promoting childbirth. NOT! I outlined the various financial advantages and government subsidized perks that accrue to MARRIED couples. I stated the rea...
- August 21st, 2004, 8:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: gay marriage
- Replies: 25
- Views: 11015
- August 21st, 2004, 2:25 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: gay marriage
- Replies: 25
- Views: 11015
I'm finally unruffled enough to vote on this matter: I would choose #4. The state ought to stay out of it altogether. "The government that governs least, governs best." Choosing #4 implies #2. It ought to be available to anybody. As for #3 -- #4 is an ideal. The State's already got its dirty hands i...