on the spectrum and ABA politics
Posted: July 25th, 2012, 12:24 pm
ABA is abuse not therapy
!!!!!!!!!
the positive re-enforcers only exist for further negativity and punishment
it is being used
as psychological modelling - in the context of shaping and politicizing the society
as much as the individual
AS ADULTS and exists as
issues of
rights to refusal
and rights to restitution
...
but the bigger issue and concern
is agencies of the government who are not disclosing
their involvement ...
where it would have to be stated and disclosed to the autistic adult
the reason for their involvement if any ... referred to as representation
of involvement
...
the issue of agencies involved with recruiting in the context
of non-disclosed involvement, constitutes
an illegality ...
unless consent is given - but in a non-disclosed relationship
there is no point of contact to consent
nor to refuse
the burden of proof therefore is on the crown
not the society nor the individual to prove liability
which constitutes representation of the society
and autistic adults ... and constitutes a democratic representation
of people in society
...
the burden of proof is the representation of the autistic society (individuals)
and of government
to prevent autistics from arguments of
violating autistic adult's rights and freedoms, and arguments of health and
to prevent arguments of 'human trafficking' and/or 'prostitution'
...
therefore any involvement with autistic people in the context
of the government or governing bodies
would have to be remunerative and liable
to prevent these arguments of violation
...
to prevent lawsuits and charges being laid (as indictable offences)
for concerns such as targeting, bullying, privacy invasion, illegal recruitment (because it is non-remunerative and non-liable)
misrepresentation, injury (psychological or physical), and allegedly accidental death (referencing stephanie jobin
and a host of other autistic people - and the technology being used - which was never disclosed but theorized
as being used but not disclosed due to a securities argument)
and
to prevent arguments of restitution for society and individual
...
this argument represents
extrication from a securities argument
and it also represents
restitution
for society and individuals
and therefore
represents
socialization and integration and efficacy into our
beautiful and overly stated country
...
aha!
!!!!!!!!!
the positive re-enforcers only exist for further negativity and punishment
it is being used
as psychological modelling - in the context of shaping and politicizing the society
as much as the individual
AS ADULTS and exists as
issues of
rights to refusal
and rights to restitution
...
but the bigger issue and concern
is agencies of the government who are not disclosing
their involvement ...
where it would have to be stated and disclosed to the autistic adult
the reason for their involvement if any ... referred to as representation
of involvement
...
the issue of agencies involved with recruiting in the context
of non-disclosed involvement, constitutes
an illegality ...
unless consent is given - but in a non-disclosed relationship
there is no point of contact to consent
nor to refuse
the burden of proof therefore is on the crown
not the society nor the individual to prove liability
which constitutes representation of the society
and autistic adults ... and constitutes a democratic representation
of people in society
...
the burden of proof is the representation of the autistic society (individuals)
and of government
to prevent autistics from arguments of
violating autistic adult's rights and freedoms, and arguments of health and
to prevent arguments of 'human trafficking' and/or 'prostitution'
...
therefore any involvement with autistic people in the context
of the government or governing bodies
would have to be remunerative and liable
to prevent these arguments of violation
...
to prevent lawsuits and charges being laid (as indictable offences)
for concerns such as targeting, bullying, privacy invasion, illegal recruitment (because it is non-remunerative and non-liable)
misrepresentation, injury (psychological or physical), and allegedly accidental death (referencing stephanie jobin
and a host of other autistic people - and the technology being used - which was never disclosed but theorized
as being used but not disclosed due to a securities argument)
and
to prevent arguments of restitution for society and individual
...
this argument represents
extrication from a securities argument
and it also represents
restitution
for society and individuals
and therefore
represents
socialization and integration and efficacy into our
beautiful and overly stated country
...
aha!