Studio8 - Uniting the Arts

Peterson very well may have done it, but the case was FAR from convincing; no weapon, no murder scenes, no proof of how he loaded his dead pregnant wife into the back of his truck or a boat. Many missing facts and evidence. And what if he DIDN'T do it? Yeah he was most likely a scumbag and a liar, and as the defense attorney Geragos said (Geragos is also to be commended for defending that boy ) , the jurors may have detested Peterson, but simply hating him for being a liar and philanderer is not sufficient grounds and real poor excuse for the 187 #1 conviction, if the evidence ain't there. And interesting that the lead foreman of the jury was dismissed 2 or 3 days prior to the verdict. Obviously the feminists were out to hang Peterson, and he surely is no role model, but their zeal to convict was nauseating, over-the-top emotionalism.