I tell you, I don't like this and I'm very worried......
I'd be interested in your thoughts...
H

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/ ... 4751.shtml
PG&E Saw San Bruno Pipeline As "Unacceptably" High Risk
As early as 2007, Pacific Gas & Electric Company officials considered a portion of the gas main that ruptured and triggered the deadly San Bruno blaze on Thursday to be at "unacceptably" high risk for failure, according to documents obtained by The Bay Citizen........
The utility company had planned to repair by 2013 a 7,481-foot long section of pipe, which it deemed-based on internal risk assessments made in 2007 - one of PG&E's "top 100 highest risk line sections."
How did PG&E know it was at risk?
As of now, there's no indication of what triggered PG&E's concern over the San Bruno pipe.
How Do You Inspect a Natural-Gas Pipeline?
With pigs, of course.
By Brian Palmer
Posted Monday, Sept. 13, 2010, at 6:33 PM ET
http://www.slate.com/id/2267164?wpisrc=xs_wp_0001
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests