from the nytimes.comJustices Set Limits on Public Employees' Speech Rights
E-MailPrint Reprints Save
By DAVID STOUT
Published: May 30, 2006
WASHINGTON, May 30 — The Supreme Court declared today, in a ruling affecting millions of government employees, that the Constitution does not always protect their free-speech rights for what they say on the job.
Skip to next paragraph
Related
Majority Opinion
Dissents: Justice Souter | Justice StevensIn a 5-to-4 decision, the court held that public employees' free-speech rights are protected when they speak out as citizens on matters of public concern, but not when they speak out in the course of their official duties.
Something that matters to me more than gay marriage
-
gypsyjoker
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: May 26th, 2005, 9:01 am
- Location: stilltrucking's vanity
- Contact:
Something that matters to me more than gay marriage
Free Rice
Avatar Courtesy of the Baron de Hirsch Fund
'Blessed is he who was not born, Or he, who having been born, has died. But as for us who live, woe unto us, Because we see the afflictions of Zion, And what has befallen Jerusalem." Pseudepigrapha
Avatar Courtesy of the Baron de Hirsch Fund
'Blessed is he who was not born, Or he, who having been born, has died. But as for us who live, woe unto us, Because we see the afflictions of Zion, And what has befallen Jerusalem." Pseudepigrapha
-
gypsyjoker
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: May 26th, 2005, 9:01 am
- Location: stilltrucking's vanity
- Contact:
Firsty there is not going to be a gay marriage amendment.
But there are a lot of dirty secretes out there. This regime has a lot to hide.
National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), founded in August 2004, is an independent and nonpartisan alliance of whistleblowers who have come forward to address our nation’s security weaknesses; to inform authorities of security vulnerabilities in our intelligence agencies, at nuclear power plants and weapon facilities, in airports, and at our nation’s borders and ports; to uncover government waste, fraud, abuse, and in some cases criminal conduct. more....
Latest
U.S. Congress pulls the shades on the House of Death, Narcosphere, May 7, 2006
House Republican Leaders Reject Two Bipartisan Attempts to Protect National Security Whistleblowers, May 3, 2006
NSWBC Press Release
Congress Not Allowed to Receive Information from NSA Whistleblower, April 26, 2006
NSWBC Press Advisory
Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Nurse Joins with VA Whistleblower and National Security Whistleblower Coalitions to Support Freedom of Speech and Protection of Veterans, April 27, 2006
NSWBC Members Speak Out
Members' letters to Reps. Davis & Souder re attacks on whistleblowers, March 28, 2006
Republican Committee Members Oppose Whistleblower Protections!
Video Clip - Rep. Mark Souder ranting and attacking whistleblowers!!
Latest on Whistleblower Legislation
Reps. MARKEY, MALONEY Introduce Comprehensive Whistleblower Legislation - "Paul Revere Freedom to Warn Act" March 9, 2006
Senator Lautenberg introduces a bill based on NSWBC's proposed Model Legislation for all Whistleblowers February 14, 2006
Staff members from both offices were briefed last November about the details of the mass murder in Ciudad Juárez, the participation of a U.S. government informant in those murders and the subsequent cover-up carried out by the Executive Branch agencies involved in the House of Death case — including DHS’ U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Antonio and El Paso.
Congress Not Allowed to Receive Information from NSA Whistleblower
The Chairmen of the House & Senate Intelligence Committees Dodge Oversight Responsibility; Again!
On December 22, 2005, the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC) made public the request by a former NSA intelligence analyst and action officer to report to Congress probable unlawful and unconstitutional acts conducted while he was an intelligence officer with the National Security Agency (NSA) and with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). NSWBC urged the congress to hold hearings and let Mr. Tice testify. Today, more than four months after Mr. Tice’s letters were sent to the chairs of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees and publicized in the media, he has yet to receive a response and be given an opportunity to lawfully disclose his first-hand account of criminal acts conducted by the National Security Agency.
Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Nurse Joins with VA Whistleblower and National Security Whistleblower Coalitions to Support Freedom of Speech and Protection of Veterans
Laura Berg has been a registered nurse at the Albuquerque, New Mexico Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital for over 15 years. In her current role as a Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialist, she has recently observed returning veterans with a myriad of psychiatric disturbances resulting from experiences encountered in the Middle East. Berg’s work history has been exemplary, with consistent outstanding performance ratings.
For Publicly expressing her views on certain political issues in September 2005 (Click Here), Ms. Berg was intimidated and harassed (Click Here) by VA administrators. The ACLU has pledged to support and currently represent her case against the VA and associated government officials (Click Here).
But there are a lot of dirty secretes out there. This regime has a lot to hide.
National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), founded in August 2004, is an independent and nonpartisan alliance of whistleblowers who have come forward to address our nation’s security weaknesses; to inform authorities of security vulnerabilities in our intelligence agencies, at nuclear power plants and weapon facilities, in airports, and at our nation’s borders and ports; to uncover government waste, fraud, abuse, and in some cases criminal conduct. more....
Latest
U.S. Congress pulls the shades on the House of Death, Narcosphere, May 7, 2006
House Republican Leaders Reject Two Bipartisan Attempts to Protect National Security Whistleblowers, May 3, 2006
NSWBC Press Release
Congress Not Allowed to Receive Information from NSA Whistleblower, April 26, 2006
NSWBC Press Advisory
Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Nurse Joins with VA Whistleblower and National Security Whistleblower Coalitions to Support Freedom of Speech and Protection of Veterans, April 27, 2006
NSWBC Members Speak Out
Members' letters to Reps. Davis & Souder re attacks on whistleblowers, March 28, 2006
Republican Committee Members Oppose Whistleblower Protections!
Video Clip - Rep. Mark Souder ranting and attacking whistleblowers!!
Latest on Whistleblower Legislation
Reps. MARKEY, MALONEY Introduce Comprehensive Whistleblower Legislation - "Paul Revere Freedom to Warn Act" March 9, 2006
Senator Lautenberg introduces a bill based on NSWBC's proposed Model Legislation for all Whistleblowers February 14, 2006
Staff members from both offices were briefed last November about the details of the mass murder in Ciudad Juárez, the participation of a U.S. government informant in those murders and the subsequent cover-up carried out by the Executive Branch agencies involved in the House of Death case — including DHS’ U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Antonio and El Paso.
Congress Not Allowed to Receive Information from NSA Whistleblower
The Chairmen of the House & Senate Intelligence Committees Dodge Oversight Responsibility; Again!
On December 22, 2005, the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC) made public the request by a former NSA intelligence analyst and action officer to report to Congress probable unlawful and unconstitutional acts conducted while he was an intelligence officer with the National Security Agency (NSA) and with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). NSWBC urged the congress to hold hearings and let Mr. Tice testify. Today, more than four months after Mr. Tice’s letters were sent to the chairs of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees and publicized in the media, he has yet to receive a response and be given an opportunity to lawfully disclose his first-hand account of criminal acts conducted by the National Security Agency.
Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Nurse Joins with VA Whistleblower and National Security Whistleblower Coalitions to Support Freedom of Speech and Protection of Veterans
Laura Berg has been a registered nurse at the Albuquerque, New Mexico Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital for over 15 years. In her current role as a Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialist, she has recently observed returning veterans with a myriad of psychiatric disturbances resulting from experiences encountered in the Middle East. Berg’s work history has been exemplary, with consistent outstanding performance ratings.
For Publicly expressing her views on certain political issues in September 2005 (Click Here), Ms. Berg was intimidated and harassed (Click Here) by VA administrators. The ACLU has pledged to support and currently represent her case against the VA and associated government officials (Click Here).
Free Rice
Avatar Courtesy of the Baron de Hirsch Fund
'Blessed is he who was not born, Or he, who having been born, has died. But as for us who live, woe unto us, Because we see the afflictions of Zion, And what has befallen Jerusalem." Pseudepigrapha
Avatar Courtesy of the Baron de Hirsch Fund
'Blessed is he who was not born, Or he, who having been born, has died. But as for us who live, woe unto us, Because we see the afflictions of Zion, And what has befallen Jerusalem." Pseudepigrapha
my "fuck that" was meant as agreement with your outrage.
but, i did never think that us americans were so fucking stupid as to re-elect george w(orthless) bush, and there it happened. so i dont think it's wrong to stand up and oppose the gay marriage ban.
but you're right. there are plenty of things to stand up about around here. the only ones with their asses in the seats also have their thumbs up their asses, grinning from ear to ear in their religious fanaticism, blind faith in leadership and some strange ignorant facination with the monkey-nosed asshats in the republican party and, generally, the conservative right (wrong).
but, i did never think that us americans were so fucking stupid as to re-elect george w(orthless) bush, and there it happened. so i dont think it's wrong to stand up and oppose the gay marriage ban.
but you're right. there are plenty of things to stand up about around here. the only ones with their asses in the seats also have their thumbs up their asses, grinning from ear to ear in their religious fanaticism, blind faith in leadership and some strange ignorant facination with the monkey-nosed asshats in the republican party and, generally, the conservative right (wrong).
and knowing i'm so eager to fight cant make letting me in any easier.
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
-
stilltrucking
- Posts: 20646
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
- Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas
6000 dead in Baghdad alone this year. It is the war most of all that I want to stand up and protest about.
The crack down on whistleblowers is nothing but an attempt to cover their asses. I am waiting for the next edition of The Pentagon Papers to come out. The updated version circa 2006.
I don't know if you are married firsty. I wish you every happiness, I would have loved to be there to dance at your wedding.
I run that election of 2004 through my mind over and over playing what if...?
The crack down on whistleblowers is nothing but an attempt to cover their asses. I am waiting for the next edition of The Pentagon Papers to come out. The updated version circa 2006.
I don't know if you are married firsty. I wish you every happiness, I would have loved to be there to dance at your wedding.
I run that election of 2004 through my mind over and over playing what if...?
i'm glad you werent at my wedding. if you had been, whatever gift you bought for me would be either locked up out of my sight or smashed on the sidewalk.
i'll invite you to the next one.
yo, you. i think you hate me. i think you love me in spite of yourself. i love you. lets get married.
i am standing up quite a bit these days. gay marriage is for fags. ha. heh. marriage is crazy. did you see john stewart last nite? he ripped bill bennett a new one and bill bennett had no decent responses. it was beautiful.
i'm in a good mood today. look out.
i'll invite you to the next one.
yo, you. i think you hate me. i think you love me in spite of yourself. i love you. lets get married.
i am standing up quite a bit these days. gay marriage is for fags. ha. heh. marriage is crazy. did you see john stewart last nite? he ripped bill bennett a new one and bill bennett had no decent responses. it was beautiful.
i'm in a good mood today. look out.
and knowing i'm so eager to fight cant make letting me in any easier.
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
-
stilltrucking
- Posts: 20646
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
- Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas
Yes I do love you but men are so boring. It would never work for me. I have never been married myself.
Even if the ammendment gets the two thirds vote in congress it still has to be ratified by the states. Remember the ERA? There is time limit for ratification usualy about seven years I think. So we/you got to get our acts together in 13 states to stop it.
No cable TV I watch a lot of PBS
Even if the ammendment gets the two thirds vote in congress it still has to be ratified by the states. Remember the ERA? There is time limit for ratification usualy about seven years I think. So we/you got to get our acts together in 13 states to stop it.
http://www.usconstitution.net/constam.htmlRegardless of which of the two proposal routes is taken, the amendment must be approved by three-fourths of states. The amendment as passed may specify whether the bill must be passed by the state legislatures or by a state convention.
No cable TV I watch a lot of PBS
-
abcrystcats
- Posts: 619
- Joined: August 20th, 2004, 9:37 pm
Where have you been? This isn't just an issue for public employees. It's an issue for all employees.
It seems that our rights to free speech stop when our cars roll into the parking lots of our places of work. It extends beyond them as well. My employer would be well within her/his rights to fire me if I showed up on a street corner preaching the evils of my employer's products or methods of doing business. I doubt the ACLU would be able to protect me. At all.
I first became aware of this trend in 1981. That was when some person in the hospital cafeteria complained about the food too many times.
No, I am not kidding. It was the FOOD. She was on the premises but off-duty. Her audience was the people on either side of her in line.
She got FIRED.
Yes, someone did call the ACLU. They could do nothing.
If that happened in 1981 to a hospital orderly, why are you surprised that public employees rights to free speech are suppressed?
Free speech hasn't existed in this country for decades.
Does this matter to me more than gay marriage? Hell, yes! It's the scariest trend in our times! Corporations have more rights than individuals. It's the new feudalism. And if the government wants to horn in on the trend, it's no surprise to me ....
It seems that our rights to free speech stop when our cars roll into the parking lots of our places of work. It extends beyond them as well. My employer would be well within her/his rights to fire me if I showed up on a street corner preaching the evils of my employer's products or methods of doing business. I doubt the ACLU would be able to protect me. At all.
I first became aware of this trend in 1981. That was when some person in the hospital cafeteria complained about the food too many times.
No, I am not kidding. It was the FOOD. She was on the premises but off-duty. Her audience was the people on either side of her in line.
She got FIRED.
Yes, someone did call the ACLU. They could do nothing.
If that happened in 1981 to a hospital orderly, why are you surprised that public employees rights to free speech are suppressed?
Free speech hasn't existed in this country for decades.
Does this matter to me more than gay marriage? Hell, yes! It's the scariest trend in our times! Corporations have more rights than individuals. It's the new feudalism. And if the government wants to horn in on the trend, it's no surprise to me ....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest