Page 1 of 1

Iran, Bombs, and Change

Posted: June 16th, 2009, 5:11 pm
by Yejun
Matt Yglesias, in a recent post about the administration's "debate" over whether to bomb Iran, wisely included a random photograph of an Iranian street with civilians walking on it. These are the people Norm Podhoretz and his comrades want to slaughter:


Image
Our ability to render invisible the people we kill when cheering on our wars is one of the primary mechanisms which make it so easy to embrace that option.

--Glenn Greenwald

By looking into Iran now, what will the neocons say if this doesn't pan out?

Posted: June 17th, 2009, 8:45 am
by still.trucking
Bomb Iran -- with love!

Not long ago, Republicans were talking about attacking Iran. Now they think Obama doesn't love Iran enough

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/ ... ran_obama/

Posted: June 17th, 2009, 1:35 pm
by Nazz
Yejun, not sure I understand. If what doesn't pan out?

And besides, who really cares what the neo-CONS have to say at this point? Or the friggin' right wing in general for that matter. They've rendered themselves pretty much a joke, and really should all just stagger into the tank and "sleep it off"-- and don't come out until they're somehow relevant.

Posted: June 18th, 2009, 10:54 am
by still.trucking

Posted: June 20th, 2009, 5:39 pm
by e_dog
Iranians know howta partay!

We should surrender to them.