On Paying as you go
Posted: August 7th, 2011, 11:43 am
Kind folks & gentle people, our country got into this "debt problem" by not
doing what common sense tells us to do: "Pay as you go". This means that one makes sure, that when one "lives on float", that a country, etc. has enough capital to pay the increments when the checks come due.
The republican party did not do that for eight years under Bush. They spent
and reduced revenue coming in. We went from having a surplus for one of the
few times in history to being in possible default. The federal government tried
to bail us out and raised the debt ceiling, which is an automatic given if you
are "living on float". (See "George Bush adds $4 Trillion to National Debt" by
Mark Knoller, Sept. 29, 2008, White House correspondent for CBS news.)
The above realization is one reason that the republicans were voted out of office to begin with. We need revenue coming in: Mayor Bloomberg of New York has said the same thing in a recent TV interview on PBS.
So, who is most able to pay additional revenue? The multi-national corporations and the rich... So let's not fool ourselves again and let's vote for
good old "tax and spend". Logically, in order to spend, we must tax.
So there you have it in a nutshell. Whose economic policy fits the
above "tax and spend" motif the best? The Democratic Party, who,
incidentally, got us out of the last "Great Depression". Yes, the "Great
Recession" is not over yet. All the tea party republican "smoke and mirrors"
does not change the fact that the Democrats have, basically, more sound
fiscal policy. Now, if we could just get the Federal Reserve to see it that
way and the fools which continue to snafu fiscal policy by not voting for
a tax increase. Thank you, and good luck.
doing what common sense tells us to do: "Pay as you go". This means that one makes sure, that when one "lives on float", that a country, etc. has enough capital to pay the increments when the checks come due.
The republican party did not do that for eight years under Bush. They spent
and reduced revenue coming in. We went from having a surplus for one of the
few times in history to being in possible default. The federal government tried
to bail us out and raised the debt ceiling, which is an automatic given if you
are "living on float". (See "George Bush adds $4 Trillion to National Debt" by
Mark Knoller, Sept. 29, 2008, White House correspondent for CBS news.)
The above realization is one reason that the republicans were voted out of office to begin with. We need revenue coming in: Mayor Bloomberg of New York has said the same thing in a recent TV interview on PBS.
So, who is most able to pay additional revenue? The multi-national corporations and the rich... So let's not fool ourselves again and let's vote for
good old "tax and spend". Logically, in order to spend, we must tax.
So there you have it in a nutshell. Whose economic policy fits the
above "tax and spend" motif the best? The Democratic Party, who,
incidentally, got us out of the last "Great Depression". Yes, the "Great
Recession" is not over yet. All the tea party republican "smoke and mirrors"
does not change the fact that the Democrats have, basically, more sound
fiscal policy. Now, if we could just get the Federal Reserve to see it that
way and the fools which continue to snafu fiscal policy by not voting for
a tax increase. Thank you, and good luck.