in the present paradigm of partisanship, cronyism, bickering and smear
in relating a politicization as an issue based consensus
there wouldn't exist the cost of partisanship
where one group decides what the other decides to undo
and the cost that ensues
where nothing gets done but the seeming waste of public money
though it makes for great entertainment
as it makes mockery of ourselves as society
as much as to find that we would agree with some issues on the left
and some issues on the right
...
some might say it would create a monopolized society
of partisanship in itself
the socio-economic partisanship
of the ghetto
...
does it create a ghetto politicization
or does it create a potentiated (economy) politicization
why would we want to live in a ghetto or gulag ?
...
on local issues and municipal affairs
deciding concerns that relate to street signs
and more bicycle lanes
an issue based consensus - seems more appropriate
as much as it empowers a democracy
in relating a politicization as an issue based consensus
there wouldn't exist the cost of partisanship
where one group decides what the other decides to undo
and the cost that ensues
where nothing gets done but the seeming waste of public money
though it makes for great entertainment
as it makes mockery of ourselves as society
as much as to find that we would agree with some issues on the left
and some issues on the right
...
some might say it would create a monopolized society
of partisanship in itself
the socio-economic partisanship
of the ghetto
...
does it create a ghetto politicization
or does it create a potentiated (economy) politicization
why would we want to live in a ghetto or gulag ?
...
on local issues and municipal affairs
deciding concerns that relate to street signs
and more bicycle lanes
an issue based consensus - seems more appropriate
as much as it empowers a democracy
