Spy-gate: The Saga continues . . .
Posted: May 11th, 2006, 4:23 pm
AP - 2 hours, 45 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - President Bush did not confirm or deny a newspaper report Thursday that the National Security Agency was collecting records of tens of millions of ordinary Americans' phone calls. "Our intelligence activities strictly target al-Qaida and their known affiliates," Bush said. "We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans." USA Today, based on anonymous sources it said had direct knowledge of the arrangement, reported that AT&T Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and BellSouth Corp. began turning over records of Americans' phone calls to the NSA shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Yahoo News' headline for this piece reads:
Bush Doesn't Confirm NSA Data Collection
interesting how, as yet another confirmation of my hypothesis of the (self?-)censorship of news headlines, the story's point of his neither confirming NOR DENYING the report was transfromed into the totally awkward (for journalism) and rare contortion of language "Bush does not confirm . . ." as opposed to "Bush does not deny" or "Bush neither confirms nor denies".
WASHINGTON - President Bush did not confirm or deny a newspaper report Thursday that the National Security Agency was collecting records of tens of millions of ordinary Americans' phone calls. "Our intelligence activities strictly target al-Qaida and their known affiliates," Bush said. "We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans." USA Today, based on anonymous sources it said had direct knowledge of the arrangement, reported that AT&T Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and BellSouth Corp. began turning over records of Americans' phone calls to the NSA shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Yahoo News' headline for this piece reads:
Bush Doesn't Confirm NSA Data Collection
interesting how, as yet another confirmation of my hypothesis of the (self?-)censorship of news headlines, the story's point of his neither confirming NOR DENYING the report was transfromed into the totally awkward (for journalism) and rare contortion of language "Bush does not confirm . . ." as opposed to "Bush does not deny" or "Bush neither confirms nor denies".