Lieberman
Lieberman
or should we say, Leave'er man.
when Joe announced he'd run anyway despite losing the Democratic party's nomination, he proved exactly what his opponent was agruing all along -- that Lieberman was not acting like a true Democrat in the Senate.
Lieberman reveals himself to a private-interest driven opportunist and a hypocrit to boot, since he did not stand up for Ralpf Nader's right to run a third-party campaign in opposition to both Gore (Lieberman's running mate) and Bush in 2000. Now, when it suits him, old Joe is avoiding partisanship.
In the future, the devil will have to create a new circle in Dante's Inferno reserved for Democrats who suported Bush and his war.
when Joe announced he'd run anyway despite losing the Democratic party's nomination, he proved exactly what his opponent was agruing all along -- that Lieberman was not acting like a true Democrat in the Senate.
Lieberman reveals himself to a private-interest driven opportunist and a hypocrit to boot, since he did not stand up for Ralpf Nader's right to run a third-party campaign in opposition to both Gore (Lieberman's running mate) and Bush in 2000. Now, when it suits him, old Joe is avoiding partisanship.
In the future, the devil will have to create a new circle in Dante's Inferno reserved for Democrats who suported Bush and his war.
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.
lieberman was always a shit. he was a pro-censorship hawk the whole way thru. fuck him. connecticut cant elect anyone worthwhile anyway. the whole state is a fucked situation of elitism vs poverty. all politicians are greedhead capitalist whores. what happened to our politicians being representatives? well, i guess they had elected a rep in conn in joe. shithead.
and knowing i'm so eager to fight cant make letting me in any easier.
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
- stilltrucking
- Posts: 20646
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
- Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas
well it wasnt good news for dick cheney, who believes the terrorists have won by defeating joe "suck some elephant balls" lieberman:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/10/cheney-ct/
Cheney: Lieberman Loss ‘Disturbing’ Because al Qaeda Is ‘Betting They Can Break The Will of The American People’
As the Mideast sits on the brink of regional war, Vice President Dick Cheney spent his time yesterday holding a teleconference to discuss the outcome of the Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut.
Cheney said that to “purge a man like Joe Lieberman” was “of concern, especially over the issue of Joe’s support with respect to national efforts in the global war on terror.” He explained:
"The thing that’s partly disturbing about it is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task."
Cheney’s argument assumes that the war in Iraq is helping the United States defeat terrorists. He’s wrong. His own State Department found last April that Iraq had become a safe haven for terrorists and attracted a “foreign fighter pipeline” linked to terrorist plots, cells and attacks throughout the world. An overwhelming bipartisan majority (84%) of national security experts believe we are losing the war on terror, and 87 percent think Iraq has had a negative impact.
Cheney should spend less time analyzing the Democratic primary in Connecticut and more time acknowledging the administration’s critical policy failures and trying to fix them. (A good place to start is the American Progress plan, Strategic Redeployment 2.0.)
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/10/cheney-ct/
Cheney: Lieberman Loss ‘Disturbing’ Because al Qaeda Is ‘Betting They Can Break The Will of The American People’
As the Mideast sits on the brink of regional war, Vice President Dick Cheney spent his time yesterday holding a teleconference to discuss the outcome of the Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut.
Cheney said that to “purge a man like Joe Lieberman” was “of concern, especially over the issue of Joe’s support with respect to national efforts in the global war on terror.” He explained:
"The thing that’s partly disturbing about it is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task."
Cheney’s argument assumes that the war in Iraq is helping the United States defeat terrorists. He’s wrong. His own State Department found last April that Iraq had become a safe haven for terrorists and attracted a “foreign fighter pipeline” linked to terrorist plots, cells and attacks throughout the world. An overwhelming bipartisan majority (84%) of national security experts believe we are losing the war on terror, and 87 percent think Iraq has had a negative impact.
Cheney should spend less time analyzing the Democratic primary in Connecticut and more time acknowledging the administration’s critical policy failures and trying to fix them. (A good place to start is the American Progress plan, Strategic Redeployment 2.0.)
and knowing i'm so eager to fight cant make letting me in any easier.
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
our government threatens our very existence. they fail to provide for their people who are most in need, and they serve the tiniest wealthy class.
it's pretty simple, really. if we dont fight for ourselves, all the billions of people in the world who hate america will kill us as a proxy for our government and wealthy class they cant get to.
our government has put us under attack. our government is what is threatening our way of life, our happiness, our freedoms and our safety.
it's pretty simple, really. if we dont fight for ourselves, all the billions of people in the world who hate america will kill us as a proxy for our government and wealthy class they cant get to.
our government has put us under attack. our government is what is threatening our way of life, our happiness, our freedoms and our safety.
and knowing i'm so eager to fight cant make letting me in any easier.
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
[url=http://stealthiswiki.nine9pages.com]Steal This Book Vol 2[/url]
[url=http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?26032]Get some hosting![/url]
- stilltrucking
- Posts: 20646
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
- Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas
Yeah we are a lot safer now, how you say? fuck me runnin?Cheney’s argument assumes that the war in Iraq is helping the United States defeat terrorists.
I been hearing the word, defeatist a lot lately. Here is a conspiracy theory for you firsty. They know they are going to get their asses kicked in the November elections. The best thing that could happen for them. Then they can blame the catostrophic end of the war on Iraq on those defeatist democrats. Leaves them in good shape to keep the executive office in 08.
I am sick and tired of being sick and tired. I am going for bemusement these days. I feel so smart sometimes it bemuses me to think I know what is happening.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests