jimboloco wrote:the initial pics load fast with ,e and the total screen enlargements are really kool for getting in to the scenes.
I agree, Jim, that the screen enlargements are very cool!
It's not a browser thing, in regards to how much time it takes them to load, it's a connection thing. (I assume you meant IE when you typed ,e)
On a cable or dsl connection, bing bam boom! They all load lickety-split! No matter which browser you're on.
Unfortunately, most people on the internet are still using dial-up connections. I have a 56K dial-up connection on the computer I'm on right now and it took something like 10 minutes for all the pictures to fully load (and I'm using IE for my browser). On the other computer on a cable connection, they came in right away.
When it comes to photos or any other images on the web, sizing them is determined by how many people you want to be able to view them. Most people won't wait 10 minutes for a page to load. Many people, believe it or not, are still using a 28K modem which is half as slow as this one.
I still have a hard time believing that 90 percent of the viewers still use a screen resolution of 800x600. *sigh*
Anyway, bottom line is, the quicker images load for the most wide-range of viewers (no matter their connection), the more likely the viewers will look, which is what we'd all like them to do.
---------
SoberOne - feel free to continue posting your images as large as you like.... we are enriched by them. I'm just relaying info, that's all.