studioeight.tv
Posted: January 7th, 2009, 2:28 pm
Studioeight is a construct of poets discussing the gender narrative of poetry, philosophy and language. The context of pseudonym and the untitled constructs exist as an allegorical theme of harmony, struggle and control that exists within libidinal space and expressed emotionally and/or logically. The context of major theme and idea is the conflict within gender and the context of a language construct and whether language is more emotional than mathematical or more mathematical than emotional. It is a discovery as much as it is a journey!
The players remain anonymous as to name and gender. This effect and theme co-relate to existing quotes and become a juxtaposition or a point of reference from where the reader is engaged in a discussion of symbol logic.
Symbol logic and it's history are argued as more paleolithic than mesolithic and constructs of this argument would only exist within the ambiguity of its discovery and realization existing as language. Its evolution from a primitive authoring system to our postmodern poststructural perspective of an advanced alphabet creates a mysticism of gender and narrative including constructs of the absurd and ridiculous.
It is an enjoyable read, as much as it is a referential to LITERACY and an understanding of logic and the history of the triangle, square and circle in its relationship with language.
It exists as an advocate of authorship as much as a minor theme in theology and existentialism, hyperrealities and symbol and whether some constructs are in opposition to the construct used to express or language itself. And how it chooses to language the critical response.
The players remain anonymous as to name and gender. This effect and theme co-relate to existing quotes and become a juxtaposition or a point of reference from where the reader is engaged in a discussion of symbol logic.
Symbol logic and it's history are argued as more paleolithic than mesolithic and constructs of this argument would only exist within the ambiguity of its discovery and realization existing as language. Its evolution from a primitive authoring system to our postmodern poststructural perspective of an advanced alphabet creates a mysticism of gender and narrative including constructs of the absurd and ridiculous.
It is an enjoyable read, as much as it is a referential to LITERACY and an understanding of logic and the history of the triangle, square and circle in its relationship with language.
It exists as an advocate of authorship as much as a minor theme in theology and existentialism, hyperrealities and symbol and whether some constructs are in opposition to the construct used to express or language itself. And how it chooses to language the critical response.
