a verse in the construct of language

[sweetwater]

the methodology of adversaries
are aversives
striving to create conflict
within the wiring
and writing of themselves

they see time as co dependent
light as the offering of shadows
in the contrast of their scripted
ideas

things that make them feel good
arise and feel alive
in the pursuit gathering and
gargantuan waging
war with adversaries

to defeat and to construct
their defeat
to plan

to spend all night thinking
of finding someone to release
their inner toil and conflict

looking for a victim of their words
the parish of pariahs sometimes
congregate in the massings

of material head dress
and incantations of their absurd
request say nice things
about how far they have stretched
themselves across oceans
terrain

and how without them
or their existence
it is questionable
that life would have meaning

deluding even to say
those who delude well
convincing those who cannot
be convinced

loving those who cannot be loved

[revolutionR]

Boy that was a mouth full, I enjoy your philosophical poetics
or your poetic philosophy, I have different thoughts about the
conundrums you foster by deliberately tackling these knotty issues
with language, how you present a real type of view of the issue
that usually cannot be approached by just stating it. My mind works
in similar loops, philosophically, yet I come at it from a direction
that is a bit more self subversive, I try to pull the carpet out from
under myself, while I attempt to pull myself up with my own boot straps.
This is a kind a fakir poetics.

[the mingo]

is a kind a fakir poetics.

ha! love it !

(and the poem too)