Ton Romus wrote:despaired roaches shuffle
soiling aspirations refuted legacies. >>> I love nonsense but this ain't no flexographic juxtaposition nor atomic horsebox
hissing feet powdering unchalked traces - >>> - ??? as above
spoored spores of imprinted ugly >>> imprinted ugly seems interesting
the spore spore no work work for me...
nothing but the wash of unwashed nothingness >>> nothingness seems precise
OK. Seems random thymus and wedged alterations swaddled in an enigmatic blank it of impenetrable semi coated gibberish and jabberwocky. I want to like this
more than I do.
That said. Composing really good jabberwocky is very difficult
and requires twisting mines.
Keep hammerin.
....hi ton...as you may not be familiar as some as the others on the site who know me and my "style", of how I express myself, through a torrent of whisperscreaming mindpainting poetry - let me try to provide a little insight, which may or may not help. it may be of no value at all. but that is not my hope or wish, but accept it as that might well be.
1stly. let me include a picture taken in - 1964 - of andy Warhol actually buying tins of cambell's soup on second avenue New York; Photo by Bob Adelman:
...that was just for fun
I use all the language devices of my resources: onomatopoeia; alliteration; metaphor; plosives; and most importantly, ‘phonetics’ - the sound of words and language. I used my vocabulary as a resource, conveying my personal experience of orchestral mind music. In essence translating that mind music into English language, with total abandon and without framework or limiting structure.
Linear understanding has little, in fact nothing to do with it.
I am a performing non performing poet.
Allow me to (slightly) explain myself. Bear in mind that the evolution of science brings us today into the realms of Quantum Mechanics, which states “everything is probable”.
pretty much like the analogy I often use, when viewing an abstract piece of art, like from Jackson Pollock, but in place of pigments and brushes I use vocabulary and any appropriate english language / literature devices I know of to express a particular personal experience.
what and how the reader views or draws from what I've written may be entirely different to the circumstances of the words and experience that initiated the writ.
my work.
when allowed, as it should be;
should be screamed silently aloud upon
and within the intimate theatre / stage
of your, or ones, own mind.
every performance, every experience, unique.
hopefully it touches you in some way.
perhaps even with some value.
worst case scenario; it leaves you cold.
most importantly I endeavour to express my experience and connection with the music of emotional, on a core primal level. The music which takes me and touches me, and runs its fingers through the hair of my mind.
my only wish is that it in some way - that it resonates or connects with the reader.
I say way too much. I am sincerely not trying to be condescending in anyway. just trying to cover what I do from aardvark to zygote as succinctly as possible. as you can tell.
not easy for me to be succinct.
here is an interview judih did some time ago with myself; it is laborious uneasy reading, but for what its worth, here it is:
https://talkingnow.wordpress.com/2010/1 ... glas-knox/
peace n loves your way.
riteon