
To quibble over definitions that are defined by those ill-equipped to properly define experiences that they themselves have never experienced are what we are up against here... but given the definition as your quoted differs considerably with my own and I am who I am... well, you win in that department.
We have spoken about religion and fear and I must say at this point that I do detect a level of fear in you when religion is introduced in the topic. Do you have a fear of religion? Curious I am and will take you at whatever word(s) you respond with regarding that question.
Myself, I have no fear of religion and see it as a stepping stone to reach the other side. All is not wrong with religion, per se, although the current climate we are living in (evangelically speaking) will certainly curtail any serious research into religions. But whatever the climate, I do not let is sway me in discovering some very good things with religions... afterall religions are but followers of people that have discovered higher truths. Iknow, I know... that is an arguable statement! But the people I am thinking of when I worte that were people like Siddartha, Jesus, Moses, Mohammed... as an incomplete list of course, but you get the idea (I hope).
Not all people that have discovered the higher truths make it a lifes work to spread 'the gospel' about what they have found, but those that have, have had followers, and those followers have taken the words of their 'leaders' and bingo! a new religion was born... altho the experience of higher truths is one, the words differ as much as the physical make up of those that experienced those higher truths. Jesus was a different man from Siddartha who was a different man from Mohammed and on and on... but that inner experience they shared is the same, only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent.
