"Gasan instructed his adherents one day: 'Those who speak against killing and who desire to spare the lives of all conscious beings are right. It is good to protect even animals and insects. But what about those persons who kill time, what about those who are destroying wealth, and those who destroy political economy? We should not overlook them. Furthermore, what of the one who preaches without enlightenment? He is killing Buddhism.'"
Given the political times we are living in I immediately equated thhis koan with what is going on in our government. Is not the current President killing truth, destroying the National Treasury and even destroying religion... not necessarily Christianity, although that is arguable. Take wars... they not only kill people but destroy the beauty of cities, towns and the countryside of wherever war is waged, not to mention people's faith and love.
Killing is an act that does not benefit the mind of a killer, whether it be an individual or a collective group of like-minded people. Killing always involves at least two. Even with suicide one is killing that which is destroying their inner peace and understanding.
Killing is a two-fold act that requires a killer and a victim. But when one is involved in killing, even for the national good, there is something that goes awry in the majority of those that have killed. Some may reach a level of peace within in a relatively short period of time, while others may live with the effects for the rest of their lives... but killing will destroy inner peace.
"Thou shalt not kill" is a Biblical commandment. In Buddhism there is the Eight-Fold Noble Path within which is "Correct actions: avoid killing, (stealing and sexual misconduct)". I trust that within any honest religion there is a taboo towards killing... it would only make perfect sense.
So what does society do with those that kill? Should the killer in turn be killed? A great social question for many countries... U.S. included. I have had disagreements with myself in contemplating this very problem - the serial killers... are their minds so broken that it would be the honorable thing to do..? Or should society just lock them away even from others not so sick for their lifetime..? This I still feel might be the better alternative than killing the serial killer. Maybe in their solitude they will reach an answer within as to why they did kill in multiples. If they learned the answer to their behavior over a period of time and they were to live, even for a day or week, a month or a year, before they parted this life, they may be better prepared for their next life. Or they may learn nothing and when they leave this life they will return to learn their lessons that they should have learned in this life all over again. This way of thinking does involve acceptance in reincarnation, which not many within our society can accept, and that is why there is such a strong revenge factor involved in punishment. Those that have the revenge factor are without compassion.
Oddly enough, compassion, in a social sense, is often equated with a level of cowardice, even though in Christianity it is written to "turn the other cheek". That way of seeing is false and many do not grasp the power of compassion and so the unenlightened continue to interpret the spiritual, therefore killing the very message that is the basis of all religions. (see original story)
The truly compassionate cannot kill. The truly compassionate does not have the desire to kill. Not only is killing a wrongful act, but it is plain stupid for the compassionate. It is an act devoid of wisdom of any kind.
Can compassion conquer the sickness of a killer? It would require patience and patience is in abundance with the fully compassionate. Compassion is the sword that can cut through ignorance and reveal the light of understanding behind the veil of illusion.
If human history is fact, and it is... warring is human's desire for survival. We are not only at war with our own kind, but we war against dis-ease, we war against poverty, we war against hunger, we war against ignorance, but compassion must be the other half included in the battles. We do not fight a forest fire by setting another forest fire, we do not fight floods by flooding our own homes. Killing and compassion must find a balance in order to ensure that we do not become the victims of our own killing, but to find the bliss of existence. It is our gift... one that requires our own opening.
[enough]
Cecil
03 July 2005
Goldenwall... where the fireworks are eternal and celebration is infinite
