Dreams and Creation
Posted: October 5th, 2004, 2:34 pm
The psychoanalyst Erich Fromm, some thirty years ago, wrote a brief essay entitled 'Dreams are the Universal Language'. He noted that everyone is creative in their dreaming, that the stories and symbolic manifestations in the dreams of persons -- who in their waking life would never dream of, say, doing creative writing -- are every bit as creative and rich in meaning and imagery as the greatest of artworks. We are all artists in our dreams, according to Fromm. The difference that constitutes the work of those whom are ordinarily regarded as 'artists' is that they are able to do also in the conscious waking state what all can do in the unconscious, dream state.
Though he is better described as a post-Freudian, Fromm still takes Freud as his starting point; as a psychoanalyst, he believes that dreams are the products of the unconscious. We might ask, then, whether the artist who creates in their waking existence is able to bring what would otherwise be unconscious to consciousness, or whether the unconscious mind is able to break into the artists everyday waking state. Is it ego or id?;day dreaming, as it were?
A common theme of religious, literary and philosophical thinking is that of 'awakening,' emerging from a state of being that is perceived as akin to being asleep. This assumes that the mind is less alive when asleep. Fromm's suggestion invites us to reconsider this imagery. Perhaps, un-awakening is what allows the creative potential to emerge?
The Taoist sage Chuang-Tzu famously recounted a vivid dream in which he was a butterfly, fluttering through the air. Upon awakening, he wasn't quite sure whether he was a man who dreamed he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming he was a man.
Surely there are many ancient cultural traditions in which the myth of creation involves dream or is inspired by dreaming. (I seem to recall listening to Alan Wats discussing an Indian story acording to which all of the universe is a dream of some sleeping deity.) So, though Fromm takes the secularized cultural form of ART as his paradigm of creativity, we can also broaden the spectrum to consider religion as another form of creativity, albeit one whose social and potentially ideological or repressive function is much more transparent (to some of us).
Though he is better described as a post-Freudian, Fromm still takes Freud as his starting point; as a psychoanalyst, he believes that dreams are the products of the unconscious. We might ask, then, whether the artist who creates in their waking existence is able to bring what would otherwise be unconscious to consciousness, or whether the unconscious mind is able to break into the artists everyday waking state. Is it ego or id?;day dreaming, as it were?
A common theme of religious, literary and philosophical thinking is that of 'awakening,' emerging from a state of being that is perceived as akin to being asleep. This assumes that the mind is less alive when asleep. Fromm's suggestion invites us to reconsider this imagery. Perhaps, un-awakening is what allows the creative potential to emerge?
The Taoist sage Chuang-Tzu famously recounted a vivid dream in which he was a butterfly, fluttering through the air. Upon awakening, he wasn't quite sure whether he was a man who dreamed he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming he was a man.
Surely there are many ancient cultural traditions in which the myth of creation involves dream or is inspired by dreaming. (I seem to recall listening to Alan Wats discussing an Indian story acording to which all of the universe is a dream of some sleeping deity.) So, though Fromm takes the secularized cultural form of ART as his paradigm of creativity, we can also broaden the spectrum to consider religion as another form of creativity, albeit one whose social and potentially ideological or repressive function is much more transparent (to some of us).