There it is in the first sentence of your post, this is about Money, and it is about statistics.
including Process and Application
as Argument for Restitution
It is aboot statistics, and Taser guns, and sudden death of epileptics
It is aboot absolving individuals or organizations from liability arguments.
And it gets pretty ironic I think.
“The irony is that definition cannot be used to compromise Citezenship, Health nor Representation.”
Yes textbooks tell me about them
It was a statistics textbook that put an end to my twelve-year college career as a sophomore.
Sorry about the confusion,
This all sounded like something from a Canadian government document or board meeting.
I hope they set a fair value for a human life, I have heard they go for as much as seven million dollars in the US.
I will back out of here in embarrassment
Maybe a lawyer is in the audience and he or she might take a stab at giving you a better legal argument. I went to law school, lasted a week and never went back.
Nothing in Doreen's pre amble talking about the proper form for legal arguements. Just say it in your own words and give reasons why you said what you did.
So I am just saying this:
Since everything has a price in this best of all objective fact statistical spatio tempor worlds we live in why not have a futures market for human life, we have one for pork bellies?
I guess insurance policies work pretty good too.
Thw whole Health and Citizenship issue seems so ailien to me until I realize that Canada is a foreign country.
I once got so frustrated that I told a joke about the holocaust on another literary website. One Canadian woman told me that if I told the joke in Canada I would be imprisoned for hate speach under your laws. Pity she was fun to do action poetry with, I guess I lost a cyber pal that night.
Welcome to studio eight Sw,
I beg your pardon about the confusion of user names.
I have had some interesting times here
I hope you enjoy it too
Sincerely,
jack tilles et al.