restitution and sudep

Critiques, prompts & challenges.
sweetwater
Posts: 1408
Joined: September 26th, 2007, 5:52 pm
Location: arctic (north by northwest)
Contact:

restitution and sudep

Post by sweetwater » August 20th, 2008, 2:08 pm

Internal Discussion on the Issues relating to ‘Proactive Disclosure and Representation’ including Process and Application
as Argument for Restitution

Referring to the Representation of Epileptics in Canada, addressing the issues of Terminology (definition), Technology and Behaviour as discrimination arguments.

One issue in question is the ‘representation of definition’ and the use of terminology to define the Condition referred to as Epilepsy. The argument is the use of terminology that compromises, Citizenship, Health and the right to represent an argument (Representation), including process and application.

The use of definition whether ‘chronic illness’ or otherwise that compromises Citizenship, Health and the right to represent an argument would only represent a discrimination, argument. Representation would not include representing an argument in breech of Citizenship, and/or Health nor the compromise of Disclosure/Discovery, nor the compromise of representing an argument, including policies of non-disclosure. Policies of non-disclosure compromise the representation of argument whether they are arguments of Citizenship or Health.

Policies of non-disclosure imply a Securities, argument and legal organizations such as the Epileptic Society are not legally nor liably involved with organizations that practise policies of non-disclosure.

Legal Organizations cannot represent their Constituency as an argument that compromises Citizenship, Health or the right to represent, Argument, nor any definition which would be interpreted as stigma, as in defamatory, misleading or mis-representative of Citizenship, Health or Representation. ie. The use of ‘chronic illness’ as a description of Epilepsy, implies a discrimination argument and represents a stigmatization and one that compromises Citizenship, Health and Representation and would be interpreted as defamatory and misleading.

Definitions that represent Citizenship, Health and the right to represent do not include the application or process of discrimination nor stigma which is defamatory or misleading.

Definitions such as Syndrome, Condition, Disposition or Predisposition are representatives of Citizenship, Health and Representation and a definition that does not involve the stigmatization of Citizenship, Health nor the right to represent (Representation), Argument.

Issues concerning technology and its uses in Society and how it relates to Epileptics such as Tasar guns and other types of technology disclosed or otherwise are a concern as much by organizational policy as by contraband, including issues such as targeting.

Legal Organizations would have to have access or disclosure on information to prove that Epileptics, Asperger’s Persons and Autistic People are a targeted group of people in society, as much as Citizens who may be victims of targeting or stalking in Society, as potentially a targeted group of people in our Society.

The Tasar gun issue as much as the Sudep issue may represent a statistic that proves that Epileptics are a targeted group of people in our Society even though there may not be any co-relation between Tasar guns and the Sudep issue as the Sudep issue may be related to another type of EMF technology and therefore, may also exist as a targeted group of people argument for Epileptics.

A Securities argument of non-disclosure may also exist as an argument of discrimination as it may also exist as a targeting statistic and a concern for Legal Organizations to address issues of Representation whether it is representation of Citizenship or Health.

The issue concerning targeting of individuals in Society is an interesting legal argument. ie. An individual who is targeted, whereupon they address the issue of targeting (due process) have a concern of being misrepresented as being paranoid, liars or delusional including the issue of mis-repesentation of diagnosis. The concerns of diagnosis arguments only exist to absolve individuals and/or organizations from liability arguments.

As if to say, to be mis-represented by targeting as well as mis-represented as process (due process).

The irony is that definition cannot be used to compromise Citizenship, Health nor Representation!

Society is involved in Proactive Disclosure and Representation and legally these kinds of situations don’t theoretically exist though policies of non-disclosure, contraband issues, internal issues and issues of proactive disclosure would only suggest that persons may and are being targeted.

The Sudep issue is a diagnosis based on inconclusive evidence or disclosure/discovery.

It is impossible to ascertain whether the individuals involved with the S.U.D.E.P. statistic and or diagnosis were not living within the legal application of discrimination (leading to death) concerning ‘proactive disclosure/discovery’ as statistic.

The Sudep issue is a diagnosis based on inconclusive evidence or disclosure/discovery.

sweetwater
Posts: 1408
Joined: September 26th, 2007, 5:52 pm
Location: arctic (north by northwest)
Contact:

Post by sweetwater » August 26th, 2008, 5:44 pm

Definition is not used in the compromise of Citizenship, Health nor Representation with respect to Legal Organizations and Diagnosis
and other issues

Nor is it represented as stigmatization in the application of Representation.

sweetwater
Posts: 1408
Joined: September 26th, 2007, 5:52 pm
Location: arctic (north by northwest)
Contact:

Post by sweetwater » August 26th, 2008, 5:46 pm

The application and process of law is methodology and terminology
without prejudice, discrimination and stigmatization!

User avatar
the mingo
Posts: 9708
Joined: June 26th, 2005, 3:51 am
Location: Tug Hill Plateau

Post by the mingo » August 26th, 2008, 9:56 pm

English next time please.
Doll, you may have found a place of rest but I'm still on the trail.

User avatar
silent woman
Posts: 337
Joined: August 19th, 2008, 4:49 am
Location: Oz or someplace like Kansas

Post by silent woman » August 27th, 2008, 9:10 am

The density of the prose is inversely proportional to the amount of information given. Obfuscation abounds
If you can't give me love and peace, Then give me bitter fame. — Akhmatova.

Free Rice

avatar courtesy of Baron de Hirsch

sweetwater
Posts: 1408
Joined: September 26th, 2007, 5:52 pm
Location: arctic (north by northwest)
Contact:

thanks but no thanks

Post by sweetwater » August 27th, 2008, 5:48 pm

therefore the comments are phony

the argument is of no use nor interest to you
that's all you have accomplished

insult to injury! or insult to death as statistic

and there might be a slight grammatical
mistake but then the argument is ... you're
only interested in grammar (or sabotage) not the issue

and the density is the legal definition issue
which is not very exciting reading

i suppose like reading textbooks

User avatar
silent woman
Posts: 337
Joined: August 19th, 2008, 4:49 am
Location: Oz or someplace like Kansas

Post by silent woman » August 28th, 2008, 12:20 am

a tough board for me sweetwater

Have you read doreen's pre amble to this board?

I give it my best shot.

anything to do with sudden death

gets my attention.

life is so cheap

The price is set

by the government

there ought to be a futures market for it.

**************************************************
Howdy SW

I like your haiku

I liked you whimsy too

leaves me with such a tender feeling.
If you can't give me love and peace, Then give me bitter fame. — Akhmatova.

Free Rice

avatar courtesy of Baron de Hirsch

sweetwater
Posts: 1408
Joined: September 26th, 2007, 5:52 pm
Location: arctic (north by northwest)
Contact:

Post by sweetwater » August 28th, 2008, 9:47 am

the argument which you are proposing
has nothing to do with the post on the board

you probably could be doreen for all i know

User avatar
silent woman
Posts: 337
Joined: August 19th, 2008, 4:49 am
Location: Oz or someplace like Kansas

Post by silent woman » August 28th, 2008, 9:53 am

I am not arguing baby sister

I am just saying

in my own words

what the contents of the text means to me

what is it means to you

what ever you are tring to prove to me

is meaning less


to me

I must appologize for the user name, it is what I used to call my last vagina,

I should do some disambiguation

the user name

I knew this was going to happen
I am stilltrucking et al
and everthing below the astericks has nothing to do with what was above

but what is above the asterics

the futures market for life

I think that has everything to do with SUDEP
**************************************************
How do I know you are not Doreen?
If you can't give me love and peace, Then give me bitter fame. — Akhmatova.

Free Rice

avatar courtesy of Baron de Hirsch

User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20605
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

Post by stilltrucking » August 28th, 2008, 10:40 am

I am going to proceed on the assumption that you really are doreen.


I will pick it apart give you more specifics

later

User avatar
Doreen Peri
Site Admin
Posts: 14532
Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by Doreen Peri » August 28th, 2008, 11:11 am

stilltrucking wrote:I am going to proceed on the assumption that you really are doreen.


I will pick it apart give you more specifics

later
I am doreen. You think sweetwater is me?

I can't write like this!

Sweetwater is a friend of panta's.

He lives near her and they often collaborate together.

I published one of his drawings in our Infinite Tide book to accompany one of panta's poems.

Now you know why I think the internet isn't real? This is the type of reason why.

Why would I want to post under another name to deceive anyone?

And why do you suspect that sweetwater is me?

User avatar
Doreen Peri
Site Admin
Posts: 14532
Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by Doreen Peri » August 28th, 2008, 11:14 am

sweetwater wrote:the argument which you are proposing
has nothing to do with the post on the board

you probably could be doreen for all i know
I'm doreen. Stilltrucking is stilltrucking. My posts are nothing like stilltrucking's. I don't write like him at all.

This is getting very strange.

The internet is a very odd place.

People suspect other people are other people and deceiving other people?

Why is that?

__________

I haven't delved into your article yet but I did look up SUPED and found out that it is Sudden Infant Death Syndrom or something like it.

User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20605
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

Post by stilltrucking » August 28th, 2008, 11:28 am

I just writing Doreen,
I know sweetwater is not you
if this is strange to you
I don't know
suspician has nothing to do with my posts

I said I would proceed as if she were you
because I respect your intelligence

and I already identified who I was to sweetwater. Twice in fact.
But who's keeping count :wink:


Here
I must appologize for the user name, it is what I used to call my last vagina,

I should do some disambiguation

the user name

I knew this was going to happen
I am stilltrucking et al
and
Here

Sweetwater I just came back to print this out, I will go over it with a fine tooth comb and get back to obfuscations, statistical realities, and the price of life, and legal opinions

thanks for kicking this thread off

it has aroused D's curiosity

always a good thing for me.

User avatar
Doreen Peri
Site Admin
Posts: 14532
Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by Doreen Peri » August 28th, 2008, 11:32 am

Sweetwater isn't a her, he's a he.

As I said, I published a drawing he did in the "infinite Tide" book which accompanies one of panta's poems.

Please don't proceed as if he were me.

Thanks, Jack!

User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20605
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

Post by stilltrucking » August 28th, 2008, 12:12 pm

you can always be to gender blind I suppose

I will proceed as I wish ok?
I like writing with you in mind.
**********************************

Sweetwater I thought you were somebody else, no matter



I Still haven't printed it yet.

might take a while

Post Reply

Return to “Workshop & Prompts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests