Page 1 of 1

Symbol Logic

Posted: December 9th, 2008, 1:55 pm
by sweetwater
The ‘single theological’ philosophy of language in its literal interpretation.

Paradox and bi-referencing is also a process in negotiation between opposing understandings, definitions, virtualities and interpretations. In referencing, Existentialism as a Theology to address the universality of its own statement seems only peculiar to the loss of its own referencing and construct.
A language construct seen from the perspective of a primitive authoring system such as cave paintings, (symbol language construct) used to organize language for communication in gathering and hunting culture, existing without reference or documentation and for the most part would only be understood as a referencing to the absence or ambiguity of it.
Computer network systems at its present stage of infancy to address issues such as complexity and literacy has included the use of a ‘painting’ language construct or iconography to simplify the ‘processes’ of a socialization and integration into postmodern culture.
Culture whose representation such as hieroglyphs (paintings) existing within largely illiterate populations were using paintings (iconography) and pictures to represent a social context that included dictatorship,slavery and illiteracy and were also under the influence of a primitive authoring system and construct. The co-relation of a picture language system from a postmodern perspective is the inference that paintings and its symbol language construct is co-related to illiteracy. The irony of this essay does include the paradox of a communication within the context of an advanced alphabet.
The political-legal system and terminology of Constitutional Laws and definitions used within the representation of a Nation’s identity and citizenship exist as the most fundamental and basic understanding of authorship within a ‘single theological’ philosophy of language in its literal interpretation.