"safe reliable nuclear weapons"

Truckin'. Still truckin'...

Moderator: stilltrucking

Post Reply
User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20646
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

"safe reliable nuclear weapons"

Post by stilltrucking » March 28th, 2010, 11:45 pm

Is that a koan?

User avatar
tarbaby
Posts: 330
Joined: December 17th, 2006, 5:25 pm
Location: Oz, or someplace like Kansas, but mostly stilltrucking's vanity

Post by tarbaby » April 8th, 2010, 1:17 am

Obama's New Nuclear Stragedy


Two leading Senate voices on nuclear strategy, Arizona Republicans John McCain and Jon Kyl, criticized the Obama policy's restrictions on using nuclear arms to retaliate against a chemical or biological attack.

If a non-nuclear weapons state is in compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty and its obligations, the U.S. pledges not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against it," Gates said. If, however, such a state were to use chemical or biological weapons against the U.S. or its allies, "it would face the prospect of a devastating conventional," or non-nuclear, military response.

That is not a major departure from the policy of past administrations, but it is slightly more forthright about which potential aggressors might fear a nuclear strike, and which might not.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/0 ... 26415.html
“Where is that man who has forgotten words that I may have a word with him?”

Post Reply

Return to “Asylum for the Terminally Vain”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest