"safe reliable nuclear weapons"
Moderator: stilltrucking
- stilltrucking
- Posts: 20646
- Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
- Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas
- tarbaby
- Posts: 330
- Joined: December 17th, 2006, 5:25 pm
- Location: Oz, or someplace like Kansas, but mostly stilltrucking's vanity
Obama's New Nuclear Stragedy
Two leading Senate voices on nuclear strategy, Arizona Republicans John McCain and Jon Kyl, criticized the Obama policy's restrictions on using nuclear arms to retaliate against a chemical or biological attack.
If a non-nuclear weapons state is in compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty and its obligations, the U.S. pledges not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against it," Gates said. If, however, such a state were to use chemical or biological weapons against the U.S. or its allies, "it would face the prospect of a devastating conventional," or non-nuclear, military response.
That is not a major departure from the policy of past administrations, but it is slightly more forthright about which potential aggressors might fear a nuclear strike, and which might not.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/0 ... 26415.html
“Where is that man who has forgotten words that I may have a word with him?”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest