Jeopardy
Posted: January 10th, 2014, 7:28 pm
All share one western trait
G D
Sadness leaks through tear stained cheeks
F#m G
From winos to dime store Jews
D
Probably don't know they gave me
A7 D
These late John Garfield blues
Post your poetry, artwork, photography, & music.
https://www.studioeight.tv/phpbb/
All share one western trait
G D
Sadness leaks through tear stained cheeks
F#m G
From winos to dime store Jews
D
Probably don't know they gave me
A7 D
These late John Garfield blues
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Nozick
the sacrosanctity of life made property rights non-negotiable,
such that an individual's personal liberty made state policies of redistribution illegitimate.
For Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) Nozick received a National Book Award in category Philosophy and Religion.[4] There he argues that a distribution of goods is just if brought about by free exchange among consenting adults from a just starting position, even if large inequalities subsequently emerge from the process. Nozick appealed to the Kantian idea that people should be treated as ends (what he termed 'separateness of persons'), not merely as a means to some other end. Nozick thus challenged the partial conclusion of John Rawls' Second Principle of Justice of his A Theory of Justice, that "social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are to be of greatest benefit to the least-advantaged members of society." Nozick suggested, as a critique of Rawls and utilitarianism
ibid
Later books[edit]
The Examined Life (1989), pitched to a broader public, explores love, death, faith, reality, and the meaning of life. According to Stephen Metcalf, Nozick expresses serious misgivings about capitalist libertarianism, going so far as to reject much of the foundations of the theory on the grounds that personal freedom can sometimes only be fully actualized via a collectivist politics and that wealth is at times justly redistributed via taxation to protect the freedom of the many from the potential tyranny of an overly selfish and powerful few.[19] Nozick suggests that citizens opposed to wealth redistribution that funds programs they object to should be able to opt out by supporting alternative government approved charities with an added 5% surcharge.[20] However, Jeff Riggenbach has noted that "...in an interview conducted in July 2001, he stated that he had never stopped self-identifying as a libertarian