Lacan.com

Discuss books & films.
Post Reply
User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Lacan.com

Post by e_dog » April 9th, 2006, 7:37 pm

The latest edition of The Symptom an on-line mag. on Lacanian psychoanalysis and culture has just been released! See link at

www.lacan.com

writers included Slavoj Zizek and others.
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20646
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

Post by stilltrucking » April 10th, 2006, 12:00 am

Say
thanks e-dog

This is all I can afford to read this week, the free preview.

March 12, 2006, Sunday
By SLAVOJ ZIZEK (NYT); Editorial Desk
Late Edition - Final, Section 4, Page 12, Column 1, 941 words
DISPLAYING FIRST 50 OF 941 WORDS -FOR centuries, we have been told that without religion we are no more than egotistic animals fighting for our share, our only morality that of a pack of wolves; only religion, it is said, can elevate us to a higher spiritual level. Today, when religion is emerging as the...

To read the rest of this archive article, upgrade to TimesSelect or purchase as a single article.
Purchase Single Article - $3.95

Speaking of moral clarity.

http://www.centerformoralclarity.net/

User avatar
Arcadia
Posts: 7964
Joined: August 22nd, 2004, 6:20 pm
Location: Rosario

Post by Arcadia » April 10th, 2006, 1:35 pm

last time I read something related with Lacan was when I was reading Winniccot. Winnicott's observation about how Lacan wrote and cited his name in some papers. An omission stuff, if I remember well.

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » April 11th, 2006, 12:15 am

stilltruck,

that essay in the Times is just an excerpt from one of the longer essays you can get from the website www.lacan.com. click on either the essay by Zizek on Tolerant Reason or the one on A Glance into the Archives of Islam. can't remember which is which, viz. the NY Times piece. in fact, both are mighty fine reads if ya have the time.

arcadia,

was that Winnicott citing Lacan or vice versa? and what what it all about if you remember?

User avatar
Arcadia
Posts: 7964
Joined: August 22nd, 2004, 6:20 pm
Location: Rosario

Post by Arcadia » April 11th, 2006, 6:53 pm

Lacan cited Winnicott. And he forgot an n or a t. Vice versa would be difficult, La.can's name is somehow easy to write almost for everyone. I can't give you more details because I don't have anymore that book.

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » June 30th, 2006, 2:22 am

"This brings us back to perversion: for Lacan, a pervert is not defined by the content of what he is doing (his weird sexual practices, etc.). Perversion, at its most fundamental, resides in the formal structure of how the subject relates to truth and speech. The pervert claims direct access to some figure of the big Other (from God or history to the desire of his partner), so that, dispelling all the ambiguity of language, he is able to act directly as the instrument of the big Other's will. In this sense, both Osama bin Laden and President Bush, although politically opponents, share a pervert structure: they both act upon the presupposition that their acts are directly ordered and guided by the divine will." -- Slavoj Zizek
at
http://www.lacan.com/lacinkXXVII6.htm

Post Reply

Return to “Literature & Film”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests