hillary crying hillary cackling

Post by **jimboloco** » January 15th, 2008, 8:15 am

Post by **hester_prynne** » January 15th, 2008, 11:14 pm

She could win wars with that cackle.....

H

Post by **bohonato** » January 16th, 2008, 1:16 am

I'm kind of pissed she won the Michigan primary. Not so much because of anything against Hilary, but because the other Dem candidates pussied out and weren't even on the ballot (except for Kucinich, who won 4%). And let's not talk about the Republicans (and I have to admit I was disappointed that Ron Paul only got 6%).

I don't know, since my favourites (Kucinich and Paul) lost before they even begun, I'm leaning towards Obama. Watched the Nevada debates tonight, I dug him more than Clinton or Edwards.

And while the topic is on Hilary, I was talking to a person a while back that stated that they would vote for Hilary just because she's a woman. Am I the only one that finds this demeaning? Obviously it is a really poor way to choose a candidate for public office, but isn't voting for her solely on her gender/sex just as insulting as voting against her based on her gender/sex? Same with Obama: seeing him merely in terms of his ethnic/racial background, whether you are pro or con, is to make a mockery of his campaign.

I've realized that I'm slowly becoming increasingly misanthropic. Misanthropic humanism; well, at least I'm historically in good company.

(I'm for the cackle, by the way.)

Post by **mnaz** » January 16th, 2008, 2:42 am

Hillary who?

Post by **jimboloco** » January 16th, 2008, 8:34 am

Misanthropic humanism is like military intelligence, anyhoo

In Florita we got th same problemo with the Demz, I plan to vote, but nobody is here, only Rudy, the Republickin, who is making news because he refused to sign a Green Bay Packers' cap. Wish it was that light and easy in reality.
I am also voting for a Republican based initiative to increase the Homestead Exemption, which will give us some relief on the amount we gotta pay in property taxes. But the flip side of this is that we need money for the schoo;s from other sources, like cutting the graft that flows thru the Pentagon.

It's true, to some Hillarious is a relative unknown, especially in the great Northwest. But she does good in the desert, man. I was impressed with all three, actually. I was dissappointed hat Dennis the menace didn't get in there, but he did have his shot already. He is the only candidate that I sent dough to.

I liked how they adressed the slandering that had preceeded the debate.
I am scared tho that McCain will be the Repub nominee, with Hucky as the Veep, that will be a formidabubble opposition to any spoonfuls of progress. So please hold your twinkies and pray.

I'd like to see Hillarious cackle at Putin, mercy.

Post by **e_dog** » January 21st, 2008, 11:51 pm

Crazy cacklin' Clinton vs.
Obama bin Reagan

and the Prole Dixiecrat Edwardz

whats this race comin' too?

Romney for emperor.

Post by **bohonato** » January 22nd, 2008, 12:52 am

Yeah, I saw your post about Obama and his Reagan love. Obama is by far not my ideal candidate, and that may be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Obama still has more experience than Hilary in elected office. According to my sister he's a Islamic fundamentalist, but then, she also just moved to Texas to get away from the high Middle Eastern population of Detroit (ptsd, not overt racism).

I'm beginning to see why none of my anarchist friends vote.

Though I could perhaps live with Hilary if I were to refer to her always by 'Crazy cacklin' Clinton'. Maybe.

Post by **jimboloco** » January 22nd, 2008, 3:00 pm

well firzt of all
i remember when i was down and out
in detroit
i lived in a neighborhood northeast of 6 mile and john r
30 yearz agoo
i would walk up my block
there was a big old house there with an arab family
they would sit on the front porch
the old man knew that i was lonely as i passed by
he always waved and smiled at me

lil tidbit

obama in his defense said that raygunz transformed amerika
because he was able to mobilize expectations of progress

it's true that lil old hillarious helped him to clarify that
he said that he did not like what ol raygunz was doing just how he done it

and remember
whoever gets in
we'll have them under scrutiny
and hope for something good

a drawdown in iraq
never mind who voted what
lots of senators and reps changed their minds about nam
we need the same about iwrack

infusions of moneys into constructive things
and away from the neo-con-artists profiteers

what else is there?
an absence of the absuurd

Post by **e_dog** » January 23rd, 2008, 1:46 am

obama in his defense said that raygunz transformed amerika
because he was able to mobilize expectations of progress

it's true that lil old hillarious helped him to clarify that
he said that he did not like what ol raygunz was doing just how he done it

and at least one say for hitler is he sure was an effective organizer...
that musolini, he sure had self-confidence. very hopeful, he.

Obama's a facade.

Only the Huckster and Mrs. Paul, an' Koosinich Spinach gotz da real gutz on dis-play. that's why they be loosers.

Romney by a mudslide.

Post by **jimboloco** » January 26th, 2008, 1:52 pm

obama''s mama you say?

edog ain't got no facade
he pure doggerel thu an thu

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

well
you sure can put out th
slammin poemz
of despair

you say hucky is real
what are we takling about

i voted early today
i like hillary's facade
her backside toooooo

daaaawwwwwwwwwwwwgggggggggggggggggg

Main Entry: 1dog·ger·el
Pronunciation: \ˈdȯ-g(ə-)rəl, ˈdä-\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English dogerel, probably diminutive of dogge dog
Date: 14th century
: loosely styled and irregular in measure especially for burlesque or cozmick effect;

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/doggerel

Studio8 - Uniting the Arts