http://www.sptimes.com/2005/06/15/North ... __sw.shtml
I saw the two articles this morning, "Solemn Tribute" and "Recalling a son, soldier, friend." Their families both had strong military histories and these two young men were brought up in that way. But consider the sacrosanct, is it treason, unpatriotic, or heresy, to state that these articles in the City & State section of the Times both eulogized well, but they also patronised? Or furthermore, if the Times prints an alternative view, is the Times a "Liberal" newspaper?
Well, I have another point of view. This is not being disrespectful, knowing well the burden of dissent, even as a Vietnam vet, hearing words of scorn and rejection from my own relatives because of my anti-war stance. I would never speak with disrespect of these greiving, yet proud, families.
I will ask this newspaper if, as one surviving family member said, "we'll meet again someday" (in the hereafter), and yet another, "He talks proudly about his son...who could imagine nothing greater than giving his life defending his country," these comments don't deserve a special attention? Well, if the Iraqis invaded America, I guess we'd be in a lot of trouble. And these young men are gone now, for this lifetime.
What is the real cost of war? Besides the dead and wounded and suffering and co-opted social programs or more free money to create new wealth? Instead we, the warriers and poor and average taxpayers contine to channel it into the wealthy elites, the stockholders and upper echelon officers of the military-industrial contractors, with our taxes and our lives. We just have our own slices of the pie, so we develope these traditions, the wealthy kids, like George Jr.'s two daughters, or Jeb's kids, all of them educated, young, healthy, yet they will not go,oh no, they have other priorities, and the military class, as well in per·pe·tu·i·ty serving generation after generation without really knowing why, just these flowing words of patriotism and service.
As Wilfred Owens, the World War One British poet wrote, in his "Dulce et decorum est", (before returning to the front, where he was killed in action,)
"If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs
Bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues, --
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori."
Is it always sweet and honorable to die for one's country?

http://www.smithtown.k12.ny.us/frshcamp ... poemsA.htm
Jim Willingham
640 60th St. S.
St. Pete, Fl 33707
(727) 341-1957
opusmaximus2050@yahoo.com
© Copyright 2005 St. Petersburg Times. All rights reserved.
Standard of Accuracy