It has become fashionable these days to express horror and outrage about the hypocritical travesty of the Guantanamo Bay prison camp. Bill Clinton (who is a born-again Republican and sleeps with G. Bush Sr). is piling on . Yes, and John McCain, who is a born-again Democrat, is calling for an investigation. Amnesty International decries the situation.
Of course Gitmo is an embarrassment. Bushco is running all over the world espousing the virtues of freedom and democracy, while flagrantly denying any semblance of due process to the detainees in Cuba. The whole thing gives our country a black eye.
Senator Richard Durbin of Ill. said last week on the Senate floor:
"If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, Pol Pot, or others that had no concern for human beings."
Granted, that statement was a little over the top. I don't think we are gassing prisoners at Gitmo yet, but we are producing a public spectacle that advertises the values and practices that we are supposedly at war to prevent.
Then:
Representative Duncan Hunter, chairman of the House armed services committee, went on TV to refute charges by Amnesty International that the Bush administration is running "the gulag of our time" at Guantanamo Bay. Hunter waxed eloquent about how the prisoners at Gitmo had never had it so good. According to him, these guys are in moslem paradise with fruits being fed to them and hot and cold running virgins. This poet couldn't believe his eyes as Hunter displayed a plate of food on fine china that was obviously prepared by the Congressional cafeteria and claimed that this is what the detainees in Cuba enjoyed. Count them. Not one, but TWO pieces of fruit. Why would these guys ever want to go home? Hunter sounded like the idiots who babble about US prisons being country clubs. I've been in a US prison and I can tell you that what the detainees in Cuba are experiencing is not out of the ordinary for any prisoner in the US. There are systematic humiliations and subtle deprivations and discomforts that border on torture happening every day in our own prisons to our own citizens.
Of course what we are doing in Guantanamo is deplorable. How can the world see the US as being anything but hypocritical? We wave the flag of freedom and equality with one hand and then with the other we rob 540 people of their legal right to due process and meaningful representation of counsel. But it's perfectly in character for this administration to say one thing and do exactly the opposite. It seems to be a matter of policy.
But all of this sudden righteous indignation about Guantanamo smacks of hypocrisy as well . These are protests from high government officials and ex-presidents of a country that has, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2,131,180 prisoners being held in Federal or State prisons or in local jails, nearly a quarter of them for drug charges. The Russians didn't have that many people locked up even at the height of the Soviet gulag.
The Poet's Eye looks askance at the 540 prisoners at Guantanamo. Let's free some of the two million of our own people that are in the US gulag.
U.S. Gulag
- Lightning Rod
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: August 15th, 2004, 6:57 pm
- Location: between my ears
- Contact:
Good piece, Lrod.
Hypocrisy and a huge credibility vaccuum in general goes to the heart of many American problems.... the Middle East in particular.
The other day, Condoleeza Rice said that the US has "traded freedom for stability" for too long in the Middle East (or words to that effect).... Oh really? Remember when Reagan and Rumsfeld backed Saddam the Aggressor and thereby extended the Iran-Iraq war, which ran for eight horrific years? "Stability"?.... fits nicely into the current littany of Official Stock Freedom Speeches with historical amnesia....
Hypocrisy and a huge credibility vaccuum in general goes to the heart of many American problems.... the Middle East in particular.
The other day, Condoleeza Rice said that the US has "traded freedom for stability" for too long in the Middle East (or words to that effect).... Oh really? Remember when Reagan and Rumsfeld backed Saddam the Aggressor and thereby extended the Iran-Iraq war, which ran for eight horrific years? "Stability"?.... fits nicely into the current littany of Official Stock Freedom Speeches with historical amnesia....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest