get your bets in now.....

[YABYUM]

Superbowl odds as posted in the August 2005 Playboy:

New England: 7-1
San Francisco: Sextillion-1

I had no idea sextillion was a number, but I think I'll go in at $5.00 and let it ride all season. Five times sextillion equals alot of new surfboards.

My Superbowl prediction: Indianapolis over Carolina, 31-14
You heard it here first.

[YABYUM]

A few more interesting facts from the pages of Playboy:


1. The average man ejaculates 7.3 minutes after entry. Men suffering from premature ejaculation lose it in 1.8 minutes.

2. In a National Geographic survey, 11% of Americans ages 18-24 could not find the U.S. on a world map.

3. 17% of the U.S. population cannot wink.

4. Last fall, authorities busted a vodka-smuggling operation that had been moving the spirit from Belarus to Lithuania using two miles of rubber hose buried 1-4 inches below the ground

5. Hawaiians consume nearly 7 million cans of Spam each year. That equals around six cans for every man, woman, and child.

6. The number of Floridian funerals paid for by the federal goverment as a result of last years hurricanes is 315.

7. The number of people who, according to official Florida records, actually died as a result of last years hurricanes is 123.


I would have to say that number 4 is the most incredible. Those cats must've really dug their vodka.

[Doreen Peri]

hmmm....

i always thought guys were kidding when they said they "read" that mag.

[Doreen Peri]

I find #5 to be shocking!

Spam?

Wow!

I have a book called "Spamkus" - haikus about spam... yep, the cheap meat in a can spam.

You can read some here
http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cxh/s ... haiku.html



Read about more Spam books here

http://www.booksense.com/readup/news/archive/spam.jsp

Spam is endlessly intriquing.

[Dave The Dov]

Spam Iiiiiiiiiiii!!!! Here in the Midwest you find it everywhere!!!! It's an acquired taste!!!! Have you tried it????
_________________
Naruto Forum

[mtmynd]

Fun stuff you've posted here, Yab.

I did some figuring with -

#1. The average man ejaculates 7.3 minutes after entry.
Men suffering from premature ejaculation lose it in 1.8 minutes.

As we know all averages are based upon the medium, or the middle, half of...

Let's take the first half of that stat - 7.3 minutes. That would at first indicate a maximum of 14.6 and a minimum of .0, but that would not quite 'fit' if we are also incorporating part 2 - 1.8 minutes.

So taking the 1.8 min. stat that would indicate a maximum of 3.6 and a minimum entry time of .0, but realistically we would have to give the 'enter-er' at least (or a minimum) of .2 min penetration, or 3 seconds. That would give the tense or problematic fellow at least one stroke.

Now if we use the .2 or 3 second as a minimum we would use 3.4 min. as a maximum we arrive at the postulated 1.8 average, i.e., 3.4 + .2 = 3.6 divided by 2 to give us the 1.8 average.

In order to arrive at the first half of this statistic the 'testers' would have to test the 'testee's' (???!) from a whole new group, (there is no given number given of the amount of 'testee's' in this stat.), so - let us begin with the 7.3 average. If I were to fairly do such a test I would dismiss the 3.4 max from the second equation because how could one factor that into the second average?

Okay... 7.3 would initially denote a maximum of 14.6 min against a minimum of .0 min, but since we cannot use the .0 min in this stat as stated above, it would be sensible to use 3.4 min as the low figure thus giving us 11.2 minute as a maximum, i.e., 3.4 + 11.2 = 14.6 for an average of 7.3 .

These figures may make you confused... some may be amused by them... and of course there are those that would refute my math. But if these figures a fair, and I think they are, it just goes to show that statistics are based upon averages and without the reader knowing more of the facts behind the averages may feel badly or even 'toot their horns', depending upon where one fits with the averages, but dealing with sexuality poses a much greater problem and that would be any stats of sexuality would necessitate the voyeur to watch the activity being averaged and that would hamper the otherwise intimate behavior of 2 (or more) people. One could bring up the question of whether the one's being measured are exhibitionists or not... I doubt if that enters the minds of the voyeur statisticians, but we will never know.

Spam anyone..??

[Glorious Amok]

here's what i think.... i think what really matters is HOW YOU DO IT. as in, the spirit with which you do it.

i mean, would you rather expereince 1.8 of the hottest, burning, flooding, intense minutes .... or 14.6 mundane, routine, blah blah blah minutes?

because statistically speaking ... both are quite probable.

[YABYUM]

1.8 minutes of hot scorching sex? If you know the man who can perform this feat, please, please put me in touch with him. Does he know that he could make millions if he would only share his secret with the world?

[Glorious Amok]

well, i met a lovely czech man this summer who could at least be timed for qualification. however, scorching may not be my adjective of choice.

smouldering, perhaps.

but remember, we were simply discussing straight-up (pardon the pun) penetration. foreplay is not included in this equation.

[YABYUM]

right right right......foreplay. Its true, foreplay would not be in the timed performance. So I guess if a fella suffers from early dismissal, he better be a genius of sorts in the foreplay area. Then again, I would assume that either way, a man would want to be well practiced.
I recomend chewing sunflower seeds. I told that to my dad and he doest believe me. but I swear its a good training tool.

[mtmynd]

If you are reading this you are human, and being human we all have our moments and we all have our minutes... so many factors to consider when talking performance. I'm sure there's not a man out there who hasn't experienced a quick-shot, nor is there a woman out there who hasn't faked an 'o'.... at least once in their lives. Kindness can be a blessing... and increase desire the next occasion.

[hester_prynne]

I can wink!
Both eyes too, although it's easier for me to wink with my left eye.......


H

[mousey1]

Wee Willy Winky?