Al Sharpton speech

What in the world is going on?
Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 3:38 pm

Who cares about the "We Shall Overcome" rerun. The black thugs attacked a kid, knocked him unconcious. That's the real issue: not the sob story, and not protesters on either side. There's no "historical guilt," either, regardless of what sob-sister marxists or multiculturalists take as faith.

Alas, you seem to be forgetting Hume again (but seem to have your Stalin primer handy)

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » September 29th, 2007, 3:47 pm

"Unconscious" really? Thought it was a concussion.

Perhaps those "black thugs" as you put it, also stole the kid's soul and performed black magic rituals against him.

Of course there's historical guilt. but there's also present tense guilt. The South remains a racist land, 'nuffsaid.


Free Huey! Free Bobby Seal!
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 4:09 pm

Sally Field imitations don't make it.

Not about the drama, or poetics, or Al Sharpton's lies. About an assault.

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » September 29th, 2007, 4:14 pm

Yes, in deed. An assault on black freedom by the white klansmen and their wanna be followers.

What's a schoolyard fight in relation to centuries of slavery and abuse and racism?
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 4:18 pm

Sally Field marches on!

BS. The southern boys have been down since about 1865: the colored people who did not care for Jim Crow could move to Chi-town, Detroit, NY: and many did. (No I am not excusing Jim Crow--but people are free to move). Racism works in all directions.

Not about your righteous indignation-- about an assault. No excuses, no emotion, no HBO bitch-liberal show of the week.

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » September 29th, 2007, 4:27 pm

Free ta move -- yer white ass outta the way of the Black Panther.

If the citzens of Jena don't like assaults they should move, not pro/persecute -- that your argument?

Goodone.



Besides. Norma Jean rocks the house.
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 4:31 pm

Our conversations are over: I made the mistake of thinking you were capable of rational discussion. You are not, apparently. You are the racist (and marxist dogmatist). Not only an insult to authentic progressive ideals, but to western poetics itself.

Don't mention gents like Pound, or Hume, Kant, Nietzsche, even Bukowski: you with the chandala.

Or Heideggerian Dasein--another concept verboten to you now. Heidegger marches with the Wehrmacht before siding with marxists----------------- or multiculturalists.

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » September 29th, 2007, 4:39 pm

I win!


By cutting off the conversation explicitly, you implicitly admit your defeat. I accept your surrender.


You wrote, much to my amusement:
You are the racist (and marxist dogmatist). Not only an insult to authentic progressive ideals, but to western poetics itself.
that's choice. hope you are either exercising or resting your sense of humour.

Rational discussion, reactionary style: -- The Whites are oppressing the Blacks. -- You, sir, are a racist. (southern drawl)
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 4:53 pm

No, sir, by saying that whites--even minors---are guilty for some presumed historical crimes even though they have not done anything wrong, and that that excuses great injustices such as violent assaults done by non-whites against whites, YOU are the racist. I am quite sure Heidegger would agree.

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » September 29th, 2007, 5:21 pm

No. Simply, that the legal system in La. is racist, and so any prosecution of blacks is flawed regardless of whether they were 'guilty' of a crime. due process, bro.

Don't trust the State. Better that street criminals go free than have a police state. Gov't and Corporate criminals, a nother story, enlirely. Lockemup.

Any case, supposed the kid was as you say innocent victim. Mistaken identitity. Maybe they thought he hung tha nooses--that woulda been morally justified if so, but they were careless about getting the right guy. Schoolyard fight gets outta control, shoulda gone to juvey. Okay, time served.

In your zealous quest to punish a few black teens, you miss tha big picture. The South is a racist land.
LA Riot redux.
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 5:41 pm

Don't trust the State. Better that street criminals go free than have a police state. Gov't and Corporate criminals, a nother story, enlirely
That's a different issue. I would agree with that perspective to some extent, in principle: but that also means that all the liberal , ACLU do-gooder judges and law people, demo cop unions, are held guilty (and that even the hicks doing time for all sorts of petty shit are freed as well), and that bureaucracies are dissolved.

That sort of anti-statist anarchism though more or less implies a state of nature: that is arguably what exists in the south already (think Katrina.). So give everyone an AK-47 (or negotiate some type of personal protection). In that state of nature the good ol boys will probably just shoot and ask questions later, as will the bruthas. I don't think you'd dig it too much. Better a sort of supremely rational meritocratic techno-socialism , where alas, the stupid and violent---of all races-- are kept down. I don't generally have an issue with most of the techie blacks I meet around El Lay: but phuck the crips n thugs...........

User avatar
e_dog
Posts: 2764
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 2:02 pm
Location: Knowhere, Pun-jab

Post by e_dog » September 29th, 2007, 6:48 pm

Better a sort of supremely rational meritocratic techno-socialism , where alas, the stupid and violent---of all races-- are kept down.
That's where we're headed tho the "meritocracy" is a pipedream. It's called totalitarianism.

Long live anarchy.

The problem with groups like tha crips n bloods is that they, like the latterday FARCe are just criminal organo-crime and or fake identity gangs. iF the urban black youth coulda been organized into a social liberatio mvt. they coulda taken over El Eh! (or Newark, or Chi-town, o Philly, or Deetroite, etc. etc.) and hence tha Feds hadda crush tha Black Panthers back in tha day. Let us hope that the next Riots will have burnt Holywould to tha ground.
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.

User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20646
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

Post by stilltrucking » September 29th, 2007, 7:57 pm

the next riots will be catered by Blackwater
the crips,bloods, ms13 and other gangs serving in Iraq
they going to be good at their jobs when they come home

Like Clay said unless you are a one percenter you can't make a living.
We training the under classes to make their way in the brave new post Bush world

More blacks in prison than college I read somewhere.

TK has made the same joke twice about the slaves having it better on the plantations then they did in Africa. Or is he joking?

TK wrote
(and life on an American plantation was often quite preferable to what a captured slave might have faced in Africa).
Just trolling I suppose
After you write something like that it is to take anything you say about race seriously professor.

I suppose I miss your subltle humor.
Last edited by stilltrucking on September 29th, 2007, 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Totenkopf

Post by Totenkopf » September 29th, 2007, 8:25 pm

Watching Brown John hang:
dat's yin and yang.
No biggy. Brown was a Nut:
Even Stinkin' Lincoln
thought so
:twisted:

(none of your business what I write, Still Spammin')

User avatar
stilltrucking
Posts: 20646
Joined: October 24th, 2004, 12:29 pm
Location: Oz or somepLace like Kansas

Post by stilltrucking » September 29th, 2007, 8:28 pm

He was a nut they say
a homicidal maniac
hacked a family to death with swords.
they say

But Frederick Douglas admired him they say.

Looking forward to your artlog professor
I won't be so intimidated trying to have a conversation with you if I know you can delete my posts if they annoy you.

none of my business what you write
jesus h christ
what is my business pray tell?

not my intent to cause you pain
please pardon my existence
I'll just mosey

Post Reply

Return to “Culture, Politics, Philosophy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest