I am just shy of Libra...edging toward the virgin side!!!
Is Poetry Masculine or Feminine?
- Lightning Rod
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: August 15th, 2004, 6:57 pm
- Location: between my ears
- Contact:
- Doreen Peri
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14663
- Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
Brilliant! And funny too!mousey1 wrote:I reckon you feel this way because the masculine voice is the voice that speaks to you most profoundly.
You can see the great swinging dick of literature wafting line to line. You fit right in.
More great lines!Sure, you like pussy, perhaps a gentle voice whispering her sweet nothings
but they are means to your ends
there is no lasting morsel fit for your hungry man meal
Not looking at all, I'd venture to guess.I think poetry is for the gentle soul
who grips the pen as hard or soft as all that that day sends
and if you see, if what first hits you in the face
is tits and lower ball-less extremity
you're looking too hard
or not nearly hard enough
Perfectly stated! You, Ms. Mousey, are one fine poet!approach a poem as vehicle
jump in, take the wheel
and drive it off your very own cliff
back seat drivers
tend to miss the scenery
staring at maps and roads ahead
- panta rhei
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 11:43 am
- Location: black forest, germany
- Contact:
El Rod, it sounds like you're noting a duality of style or approach, which you dub as "masculine" or "feminine", rather than a literal final tally of the poetic prowess of men vs. women? Or are you somehow going for both? You note that you prefer the mix-it-up "masculine" path vs. a more passive, "wistful" approach, which you dub "feminine" ("poetettes", etc.). By this reckoning, the stuff I've written would fall into both categories. I've lingered in wistful, while traveling and mixing it up. If I remember correctly, you did note that these styles/approaches are not always gender-specific.
Perhaps the main characteristic of poetry is its abundant willingness to be analyzed and broken down in countless ways, but its refusal to be definitively confined, and its sense of the ancient grind and long, long evolution of its own life. Throw a box around that! I'm sure many analysts have divided poetry in this way (T-kopf, for example, if I got his drift). But while breaking down poetry into a M/F dichotomy amounts to another experienced analysis entry, it isn't, and never was necessarily the whole picture.
Could you really tell a woman's writing from a man's? What percentage would you be wrong? Personally, I think human experience is on a logarithmically-accelerating curve in the last 60-70 years especially. Everything's coming to an "apocalyptic" boil... everyone's mixing it up, the population explosion, the dwindling resources and planet rape, the vicious turf wars of ideology, the technology explosion and wiring of the planet, the continued periodic failure of financial systems (root cause: usually greed), the rise of genocide, the materialistic mesmerizations, the angling for better seats in heaven, the messiah complexes and fanaticism... It's almost as if humanity will need a "quantum leap" (cliche alert) in consciousness just to make it through... We certainly have the numbers. What kind of poetry will that inspire?
Perhaps the main characteristic of poetry is its abundant willingness to be analyzed and broken down in countless ways, but its refusal to be definitively confined, and its sense of the ancient grind and long, long evolution of its own life. Throw a box around that! I'm sure many analysts have divided poetry in this way (T-kopf, for example, if I got his drift). But while breaking down poetry into a M/F dichotomy amounts to another experienced analysis entry, it isn't, and never was necessarily the whole picture.
Could you really tell a woman's writing from a man's? What percentage would you be wrong? Personally, I think human experience is on a logarithmically-accelerating curve in the last 60-70 years especially. Everything's coming to an "apocalyptic" boil... everyone's mixing it up, the population explosion, the dwindling resources and planet rape, the vicious turf wars of ideology, the technology explosion and wiring of the planet, the continued periodic failure of financial systems (root cause: usually greed), the rise of genocide, the materialistic mesmerizations, the angling for better seats in heaven, the messiah complexes and fanaticism... It's almost as if humanity will need a "quantum leap" (cliche alert) in consciousness just to make it through... We certainly have the numbers. What kind of poetry will that inspire?
- hester_prynne
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: June 26th, 2006, 12:35 am
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Cec, you are simply right. C'est Tout. Fini.
Wireman, you can't expect this thread's subject not to cause defense, age old subject that it is, I agree. This topic is not settled yet though, as illustrated here, old as it is, and that indeed, is a sad reality.
H
Wireman, you can't expect this thread's subject not to cause defense, age old subject that it is, I agree. This topic is not settled yet though, as illustrated here, old as it is, and that indeed, is a sad reality.
H
"I am a victim of society, and, an entertainer"........DW
- Doreen Peri
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14663
- Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
I agree with Wireman.
It's not healthy for this community.
After reading a list on another thread which states that there have been no great women writers, singers, musicians, architects, etc., I just about fell off my chair.
That, along with crude sexual references that diminish women to sex objects... well it was upsetting to read that.
I felt women were put back centuries with this type of talk.
And I started saying to myself, "I really don't like men. Nothing has changed. It will always be the same."
This isn't healthy.
I don't want to stereotype men and lump them all into one category.
I agree with Wireman.. I hope the topic gets dropped.
2 threads going on for several days? Enough already.
It's not healthy for this community.
After reading a list on another thread which states that there have been no great women writers, singers, musicians, architects, etc., I just about fell off my chair.
That, along with crude sexual references that diminish women to sex objects... well it was upsetting to read that.
I felt women were put back centuries with this type of talk.
And I started saying to myself, "I really don't like men. Nothing has changed. It will always be the same."
This isn't healthy.
I don't want to stereotype men and lump them all into one category.
I agree with Wireman.. I hope the topic gets dropped.
2 threads going on for several days? Enough already.
- Lightning Rod
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: August 15th, 2004, 6:57 pm
- Location: between my ears
- Contact:
- Doreen Peri
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14663
- Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
Hey didn't you just link to this in the other thread?
this is getting OLD!
cut it out!
Jesus
What the hell do you want?
OK you win. All women have no sense of humor. There have been no great women writers, artists, or musicians.
Women are inferior to men in every way.
OK?
Great.
You've managed to harass the women in this entire community and you don't think you're a manipulator?
LOL.
I'm going to lock the thread.
this is getting OLD!
cut it out!
Jesus
What the hell do you want?
OK you win. All women have no sense of humor. There have been no great women writers, artists, or musicians.
Women are inferior to men in every way.
OK?
Great.
You've managed to harass the women in this entire community and you don't think you're a manipulator?
LOL.
I'm going to lock the thread.
- judih
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: August 17th, 2004, 7:38 am
- Location: kibbutz nir oz, israel
- Contact:
it's just talk. nothing wrong with talk. Gets people awake and/or mad and or/thinking.
just words, people.
what is masculine? louis IV - that wig, those beauty marks, the white tights - lace, all masculine in his time.
feminine? are we amazons or suffragettes or coquettes or biblical heroines or what? who's labelling.
just words
frankly, or should i say francinely, or not, i wish i could just write poetry, who cares what gender it comes from, i want the fire back.
looking for fire - please send x-tra fire this way.
just words, people.
what is masculine? louis IV - that wig, those beauty marks, the white tights - lace, all masculine in his time.
feminine? are we amazons or suffragettes or coquettes or biblical heroines or what? who's labelling.
just words
frankly, or should i say francinely, or not, i wish i could just write poetry, who cares what gender it comes from, i want the fire back.
looking for fire - please send x-tra fire this way.
- Doreen Peri
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14663
- Joined: July 10th, 2004, 3:30 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
Yeah. Just words. Right.
Well, I think quite a few people got upset over this discourse. I was hoping the conversation was over.
But Lightning Rod told me in an IM message that those who don't want to talk about it are "cowards" and he said that I was being a "controlling Amazon" by locking the thread.
So... he wins again.
Thread's unlocked.
Go ahead, Lightning Rod.... throw out some more insults to all the women on this site and in the world.
What a great idea for this community! What fun!
Yay! I'm having so much fun!

Well, I think quite a few people got upset over this discourse. I was hoping the conversation was over.
But Lightning Rod told me in an IM message that those who don't want to talk about it are "cowards" and he said that I was being a "controlling Amazon" by locking the thread.
So... he wins again.
Thread's unlocked.
Go ahead, Lightning Rod.... throw out some more insults to all the women on this site and in the world.
What a great idea for this community! What fun!
Yay! I'm having so much fun!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests