I'm sure you all remember the Bush policy of "We don't negotiate with terrorists . . ." so loudly and boisterously proclaimed again and again ( particularly when we expected to sweep away all resistance in Iraq in six weeks-- the Rumsfeldian "time frame" announced as perfectly sufficient to "get the bad guys").
How about, instead of negotiation, amnesty ? ( heh-heh)
(link)
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u ... _the_enemy
--Z
AMNESTY FOR TERRORISTS?
- Zlatko Waterman
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: August 19th, 2004, 8:30 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
- Contact:
i think amnesty for some of the terrorists would be a good idea -- for example, most lower level soldiers should receive amnesty. but the high ranking ones, like Rumsfeld, Bush, etc. should not get any amnesty. they should be prosecuted as war criminals.
I don't think 'Therefore, I am.' Therefore, I am.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest