What would Barbara Ehrenreich say to that?"I believe in human evolution"
"Natural selection, as it has operated in human history, favors not only the clever but the murderous." Barbara Ehrenreich
What would Barbara Ehrenreich say to that?"I believe in human evolution"
"Natural selection, as it has operated in human history, favors not only the clever but the murderous." Barbara Ehrenreich
Arguably the discontented have failed to prevent homo sapien's progress the past 200,000 years or so despite their 'trying'... altho they may have caused a pause in our progress. However if we had progressed any faster than we have, no telling how many discontented there would be.Barry -
"They're always gonna be around.
The discontented, trying to mess up other people's shit"
Not you, Doreen. The thread starter.Barry wrote:
I rest my case.
They're always gonna be around.
The discontented, trying to mess up other people's shit.
Peace,
Barry
Doreen: What do you mean? Was it ME who said that?
OK.. so I'm disoriented. Just messing with your shit.
While this makes a sort of sense, Cecil, it's founded in an illogical premise: that the discontented can be made content by inclusion. All too often inclusion produces short-term contentment at best, then the discontented are back to doing what they love best and feel most comfortable doing: fucking with people for the sheer joy and feeling of power it brings. (To them, that is.)Cecil: Arguably the discontented have failed to prevent homo sapien's progress the past 200,000 years or so despite their 'trying'... altho they may have caused a pause in our progress. However if we had progressed any faster than we have, no telling how many discontented there would be.
The discontent feel disconnected.. left out... stalled on the tracks of progress, unable to cope with the reality around them. Once they feel part of society/the system, their dis-contentedness evaporates replaced by a feeling of normality, being accepted by that which they longed for before the disconnect.
It is not 'they' who will always be around, rather the emotive consequence of not feeling connected by one's connections will always be lurking in the shadows of the lonely and disenfranchised.
If one is insistent enough to be a complete and total, power-deprived asshole all their life without any regard for anyone's feelings no matter who they may be, this 'fucking with people' gives the people who offered such an idiot an alternative no choice but to put this discontented individual in a place where the sun no longer shines. In that environment, these people you seem to know could fuck with themselves to their hearts desire while leaving the vast majority at peace to do what needs to be done to be socialized hu'man beings.Barry -
While this makes a sort of sense, Cecil, it's founded in an illogical premise: that the discontented can be made content by inclusion. All too often inclusion produces short-term contentment at best, then the discontented are back to doing what they love best and feel most comfortable doing: fucking with people for the sheer joy and feeling of power it brings. (To them, that is.)
Sounds to me like a justifiable reason to go to war.Cecil: If one is insistent enough to be a complete and total, power-deprived asshole all their life without any regard for anyone's feelings no matter who they may be, this 'fucking with people' gives the people who offered such an idiot an alternative no choice but to put this discontented individual in a place where the sun no longer shines. In that environment, these people you seem to know could fuck with themselves to their hearts desire while leaving the vast majority at peace to do what needs to be done to be socialized hu'man beings.
I oversimplify ? So you prefer the complex and unsolvable to that of simplicity. When society is up against these folks, it's good to remind that one's intellect is far superior to solving problems rather than further complicating the issues with the nonsensical. But if one feels slighted by society, they band together with a semi-like-minded to defend their own falsehoods from Truth, cowering in the shadows of doubt and confusion as it that is the brave thing to do. It's up to knowledgeable and well-versed folks like yourself to lead these poor souls out of their darkness and into the light, Barry. Are you wise enough to live up to the full potential your were given?Barry -
But you oversimplify. It's not only individuals as you describe to be contended with but, more seriously, groups of like-minded individuals. What to do with them, oh-wise-one?
Why you would infer this from my comment is beyond me.So you prefer the complex and unsolvable to that of simplicity.
Due to a possible typo I'm not certain what you're trying to say here.When society is up against these folks, it's good to remind that one's intellect is far superior to solving problems rather than further complicating the issues with the nonsensical.
Here, too. Did you mean to say "one" and "they" in the same sentence? It leaves this reader confused. And the "semi-like-minded" part is difficult to puzzle out as well.But if one feels slighted by society, they band together with a semi-like-minded to defend their own falsehoods from Truth, cowering in the shadows of doubt and confusion as it that is the brave thing to do.
This last is a gem. Aggrandizment and challenge all in one, make that two sentences. In answer, Cecil, I seek not to lead. I leave that to souls such as your's, who find satisfaction in such endeavor. As for living, it's what I do, whether up, down or in the middle. I am who I am. I do what I do. I leave the interpretation of what that means to you up to you.It's up to knowledgeable and well-versed folks like yourself to lead these poor souls out of their darkness and into the light, Barry. Are you wise enough to live up to the full potential your were given?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest