Moving on sounds good to me ... I'm not good at, nor interested in, debating. I'm not a "master debator" like Austin Powers.

But that's just me.
Knip's comments are right ... whether I'm good at this or not, it is just beginning to get good.
I don't recall ever defending torture, although I'm not certain you were equating that to my comments. Yet I still wonder why that second link with the interview? -- knip
You are correct knip, the torture part wasn't directed at you or any of your comments, but as support about what Cramer said, how Americans will eventually reject, and in fact have begun rejecting, certain acceptable Israel behaviors/ideals. And torture was one of those main ones. And that, btw, is the answer for why the second interview... the issue of legalized torture and the way people are feeling about that was why I posted that particular part.
Yes, KISS. Unfortunately, it is not a KISS situation. Elements might be, but not the whole schlomozz. Which was my point.
Again, I have to reluctantly agree ... here I was working/replying with just the elements part - but even with those, it's plain to see how complicated it is. This would be the main reason why most of the time you'll see post and then step back. It's just so dang complicated.
However, in this case ... complicated or not, imo it needed to come out into the open. And who knows, maybe in the end - after it's all be hashed out - we'll all be KISS'ing over it.