Post
by Doreen Peri » July 13th, 2008, 7:20 pm
Cecil
Yeah, I agree. You have no choice but to feed the lower end of the pyramid in order to reach the higher end. I don't think you do anyway.
I don't know much about him either, honestly. I only know the pyramid triangle illustration. And I know that some people get stuck at the bottom. Or get pushed back down to the bottom because of circumstance.
In the poem, I used a dream sequence to try to turn the triangle upside down. Could it be possible that you can focus FIRST on the top items of the triangle.... community, self esteem, self actualization, respect for others, acceptance of others, creativity, etc.... and then the basic needs of food, shelter, clothing, health insurance (lol.. but i'm not really kiddin, etc... ) ... could somehow follow? I don't think so. Which is what happened in the poem... trying to turn the triangle upside down in the dream didn't work. It toppled on itself and inverted.
Why? Because without your most basic needs met, your entire energy is spent chasing them down.... finding food, shelter, clothing... surviving. There's no energy left for the other stuff.
Then again, maybe I'm not getting it right. Maybe once you've traveled up the triangle and experienced the needs near the top or at the top, then maybe you never lose that ..... when you go bankrupt for instance... when your home gets repossessed... when you become a street person getting your food from the dumpsters behind restaurants... what then? If you WERE at the top at one point.. if you HAD experienced what it was like to live with self esteem and self actualization, do those skills go away when you become a dumpster diver for an egg mcmuffin because you haven't eaten in several days?
Beats me but it's hell at the bottom. It must be. Just sayin'... think of all the people who lost their homes in the recent storms and floods. Think of the Katrina victims who STILL don't have jobs and a place to live to call their own. The list goes on.
Many of the replies in this thread are mine so looking at how many posts the thread has says nothing whatsoever about the value of the poem.
Is this poem different for me? No. And yes. I've been writing poems with philosophical topics for years. Many. The "voice" of "I" with the short staccatto sentences... that's not a usual for me though. I usually use much more interior rhyme and alliteration and rhythms and meter than I did in this piece. My work is usually much more lyrical.
So no, the philosophical topic is nothing new but the style.. the voice.. is experimental for me a little bit. Though every time I write it's an experiment so ... well.. who knows?
And I have no idea whether studying Maslow would be a waste of time or not. All I can say about that is that if you have plenty of food, a secure residence, money to buy clothing and healthcare, then you've got the time to explore it if you want.
Last edited by
Doreen Peri on July 13th, 2008, 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.